When was the last time you saw a neurotypical person binge-read Wiki articles or old books from Gutenberg Project?

The downside op doesn’t see is that said devices provide access to an immeasurable ocean of bullshit.

Take Tumblr for example… “neutotypical person…”

Tagging this SJW is exactly the kind of shit that makes you guys hilarious

Man, no one’s offended, it’s just that SJW doesn’t even apply here. Ignore for a second that you seem to not believe that neurotypical is word with a meaning, nothing about this is related to social justice. You’re just being dumb

Yeah, neurotypical does have a meaning. It means normal. 

But if some tumblr SJW started ranting about “those damn normal people who don’t read,” he would sound like a real fool. Complaining about normal people supposedly not doing something you think they should be doing is de facto admitting something about you (and what you are demanding other people do) is abnormal. 

So what Tumblr SJWs do instead is use a word like neurotypical, which still means normal but with a negative connotation. 

Then they get to say shit like, “those fucking neurotypical people don’t read!” Now, instead of looking like a jackass for insulting “normal” people for not behaving the way some SJW assumes they should, they are actually virtue signaling how their special snowflake status makes them better than those filthy “neurotypicals” they are trashing. Relabeling your opposition with negative language is classic SJW strategy, in the same vein as “homophobic” or “cisgender.”

So of course, if I see a lefty ortho blog that can’t even cite the bible correctly ranting about how “neurotypical people” don’t read enough, of course I’m going to tag that post SJW. Because that is textbook SJW behavior from a known SJW. 

But inevitably, some rando with their head so far up their ass they will still have the aftertaste of anus in their mouth a decade later will find my post. And that jackass will shoot off their ignorant opinion about how “dis no hav nuthin to do wit SJWs! but im not offended!!11” 

As we all know, the best way to prove you aren’t offended by something is to click on an internet post about it, hyper-analyze the tags the author used and then start an argument with them over it. 

Man, I actually cannot fathom how much therapy you need. Please get help, you are literally unhinged. I understand this cultish mentality you guys have against “SJWs” which aren’t a real thing by the way, it’s just what you guys call anyone that cares about anything. “they made us racist and homophobic” no, you were those things. And given that OP fully used the word neurotypical correctly, you’re just projecting as hard as you can so you can feel like the victim

This Guy: “SJWs don’t exist… YOU RACIST HOMOPHOBE!”

Odd, I thought SJWs were past saying SJWs don’t exist these days. This guy must be in the early indoctrination stages.

>When was the last time you saw a neurotypical person binge-read Wiki articles or old books from Gutenberg Project?

Binging Wikipedia is  quite common . It’s literally a meme.

This xkcd is from 2007.

As for the books…about an hour and a half ago. When I passed by the hall mirror.

> “SJWs” which aren’t a real thing by the way, it’s just what you guys call anyone that cares about anything. “they made us racist and homophobic” no, you were those things.

“SJW” is just a meaningless label, says the guy busily applying labels.

”I’m not offended!” they continue, writing a post that shows they are personally offended.

Far too many people I know shared this link with that commentary 

Excuse me, how dare you say that feminist are making everything about themselves when they’re trying to show that it sounds ridiculous when you victim blame.

I dunno, how dare you nasty little brats appropriate someone else’s suffering and near death and fucking trauma to make a point about “teh wimminzzzzes” yet again, as if male rape is somehow a beneficial tool in helping people understand rape better and it’s something you can use as a sassy little gotcha?

Show some human decency you ghoulish little vultures. 

The response to the person in the image, as always, is that very few people care when dudes are raped in the first place. And “she was asking for it” isn’t nearly as common as feminists make it out to be, cops ask what victims are wearing so they can get DNA, alcohol consumption affects witness credibility in all cases, not just rape, and there are women who have cried rape when they regretted having sex, such as in the Hofstra case. Heck, women have cried rape to get out of taxi fare.

Also, I suspect there’s significantly less “victim-blaming” going on when a woman is raped into critical condition. Just a hunch I have.