In vaginal misoprostol group induction delivery interval was significantly less (9.79 vs. 16.47 h) and successful induction was significantly higher (90.38 vs. 74.51%) than oral group, with in 24 h of induction.
Oct 26, 2011
COMPARISON OF ORAL VS VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL IN INDUCTION OF LABOR AT TERM, Dr. G.Hinduja Vidmahe, Dr . V. Radha Lakshmi INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH ...
Apr 26, 2017 · Conclusion. Misoprostol in either oral or vaginal route has proven to be equally effective for inducing labour in women at term pregnancy.
Missing: IJAR - Applied
Nov 25, 2022 · Conclusions: Our data supported the fact that induction with vaginal misoprostol can be equally effective in either oral or vaginal route.
Conclusions: The sublingual route of administration of misoprostol is comparable in efficacy and safety to the vaginal route for induction. Keywords : Induction ...
Oct 26, 2011 · Conclusion Vaginal route of misoprostol is more effec- tive labor inducing agent than oral. Keywords Vaginal misoprostol 4 Oral misoprostol 4.
Indian Journal Of Applied Research. DOI:10.36106/ijar/3004929. Authors ... Comparison Between Oral and Vaginal Administration of Misoprostol on Uterine ...
Objective- To compare the effect of IOL in nulliparous postdate pregnant women with misoprostol with and without foley catheter (30cc) on induction to ...
People also ask
Which method of misoprostol is most effective?
Is oral misoprostol used for induction of Labour at term?
How effective is oral Cytotec?
There is evidence that oral administration results in less asphyxia and hyperstimulation than vaginal administration. At present, valid comparisons between oral ...
comparative study of 25mcg of oral and vaginal misoprostol in induction of labour at term gestation in primigravida. International Journal of Clinical ...
People also search for
