CONCLUSION: From this study, we can conclude Ranson's scoring system is not inferior to APACHEII scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis ...
Missing: s | Show results with:s
Nov 19, 2020 · Objective- To assess the severity of acute pancreatitis using Ranson's scoring system and APACHE II scoring system. and to compare these two ...
Missing: Indian Applied
Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to compare the Ranson's scoring system with APACHE II score in predicting the severity of acute ...
Missing: IJAR - Applied
According to our study, the Ranson's scoring system accurately predicts the outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis compared with the physiological scoring ...
Missing: IJAR - Applied
Objective-To assess the severity of acute pancreatitis using Ranson's scoring system and APACHE II scoring system. and to compare these two scoring systems with ...
Ranson, BISAP, and APACHE-II scores, and CTSI were significantly higher in the severe AP group, compared with the mild to moderately severe AP group (3.7 ± 1.4 ...
Missing: IJAR - Indian
Oct 22, 2024 · Conclusion: APACHE II score is better in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis as it is found to have a better sensitivity and positive ...
Missing: IJAR - Applied
Objective-To assess the severity of acute pancreatitis using Ranson's scoring system and APACHE II scoring system. and to compare these two scoring systems with ...
Ranson did not have significant advantage in predicting severity and prognosis of HLAP compared to other three scoring systems. APACHE II was the best in ...
Missing: IJAR - Indian
The Ranson's score of acute pancreatitis was calculated based on appropriate laboratory data and divided into two groups - mild in 51 and severe in 40 patients.