There was no significant difference in specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy as determined by Ranson's and APACHE II score (Table 4). The analysis of complications in the studied cases showed that out of 50 studied cases, complications were seen in 11 (22%) patients.
CONCLUSION: From this study, we can conclude Ranson's scoring system is not inferior to APACHEII scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis ...
Nov 19, 2020 · Objective- To assess the severity of acute pancreatitis using Ranson's scoring system and APACHE II scoring system. and to compare these two ...
From this study, we can conclude Ranson's scoring system is equally as good as APACHE II scoring system, in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. ...
Missing: IJAR - Applied
A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson's score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta ...
A comparison of the Ranson, Glasgow, and APACHE II scoring systems to a multiple organ system score in predicting patient outcome in pancreatitis ... Am J Surg.
Missing: Clinical IJAR - Indian Applied
Oct 22, 2024 · Assessment of severity of pancreatitis was done on the basis of Ranson's scoring as well as APACHE II score. Final severity score of the ...
Conclusion-Ranson's scoring system is a simple, cheap, easy to remember, recollect, and calculate scoring system. Moreover, Ranson's scoring system was ...
Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. World J ...
Missing: IJAR - Indian
The Ranson's scoring system accurately predicts the outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis and compares favourably with the physiological scoring systems ...