Aug 17, 2024 ˇ Thisreview article explores various techniques used for conventional and digital impression and to compare the 3Daccuracy of conventional and ...
Sep 1, 2024 ˇ Data analysis leads to the conclusion that digital flow made it possible to obtain satisfactory implant-supported single crowns in both groups.
For 3D-distance displacement, the implant level-digital impression showed lower trueness values than conventional impression overall (P<0.001).
Aug 29, 2022 ˇ For short-span scanning, the accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions did not differ significantly.
COMPARISON OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) ACCURACY BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL IMPRESSIONS FOR MULTIPLE IMPLANTS SUPPORTED PROSTHESIS:AREVIEW - Free ...
May 15, 2023 ˇ Our study aims to compare the accuracy of four intraoral scanners and one conventional impression for full-arch implant-supported prostheses.
Mar 27, 2024 ˇ The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of full-arch conventional implant impressions using two different materials (A-silicone and polyether)
Missing: AREVIEW | Show results with:AREVIEW
Sep 16, 2020 ˇ The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of different intraoral scanners with the conventional technique in terms of trueness and precision in a ...
Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch. ˇ M. Y. Tan, ...
Missing: AREVIEW | Show results with:AREVIEW
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of a digital implant impression technique using a TRIOS 3Shape intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to conventional implant ...