US20070031796A1 - Literacy system - Google Patents

Literacy system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070031796A1
US20070031796A1 US11/581,879 US58187906A US2007031796A1 US 20070031796 A1 US20070031796 A1 US 20070031796A1 US 58187906 A US58187906 A US 58187906A US 2007031796 A1 US2007031796 A1 US 2007031796A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
symbols
array
student
letters
exercises
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/581,879
Inventor
Marion Blank
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/581,879 priority Critical patent/US20070031796A1/en
Publication of US20070031796A1 publication Critical patent/US20070031796A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09BEDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B17/00Teaching reading

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a system of literacy education, and more particularly to methods and systems for teaching reading and writing skills.
  • Literacy is a skill often taken for granted even though mastery of that skill eludes millions of people from all age groups. For those that are literate, an intricate set of skills enable reading and writing to be smooth and automatic processes. This set of skills, referred to as “hidden abilities,” generally appear first at a young age when a person begins to comprehend the speech of others and when that person begins to speak. For example, even a young child may know that the statement “I am looking at she” is incorrect while the statement “I am looking at her” is proper.
  • any individual does not know the technical reason behind the proper version, but instead, may offer the rationale that “it just sounds right.”
  • the technical reason is that when a pronoun referring to a feminine individual is used as the object of a preposition, the correct form of the pronoun is “her,” not “she.”
  • This example illustrates the essence of the hidden abilities that allow a literate person to do incredibly intricate constructions with language without knowing why. These same abilities are constantly operating in written language as well. For example, in a sentence such as The soldier decided to desert in the desert. a skilled reader automatically uses different pronunciations for the two instances of the identically spelled word. For people who are not literate, and especially for young children, these hidden abilities must be developed via literacy education. However, modem systems for teaching literacy fail to address the full range of necessary skills to promote the development of hidden abilities.
  • Phonics emphasizes the skill of converting the letters on a page into sounds that become real words (i.e. teaching children to read a word by “sounding out” each letter so that c-a-t becomes “cat”).
  • the processing of sounds falls under a language category known as phonology.
  • the phonics system seems logical because phonology is a significant element in reading, but in practice, phonics teaching is hindered by the complexities of the English language. Phonics relies on teaching that each letter makes a single, distinctive sound. The reality, however, is that this concept holds true for only a tiny fraction of English words.
  • a system for teaching skills associated with literacy can include a pre-reading section having visual sequencing exercises.
  • the visual sequencing exercises can include foreign symbols.
  • a system for teaching skills associated with literacy can include a pre-reading section having motor skills exercises.
  • the motor skills exercises can teach handwriting of letters in order of motor skill simplicity.
  • the motor skills exercises may begin teaching handwriting with single-shaped letters.
  • FIG. 1 is a chart depicting aspects of one embodiment of a literacy system in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the literacy system of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of a computer system that may be used to operate the literacy system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is an image of a visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGS. 5 A-C is a series of images showing another visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 is an image of a visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 7A -C is a series of images of a visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart of instructions for a visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of motor skills exercises in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of a further embodiment of the motor skills exercises of FIG. 9 .
  • FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of a further embodiment of the literacy system of FIG. 2 .
  • Sequencing and motor skills are both types of physical skills associated with reading and writing, as described later in more detail. Briefly, visual sequencing exercises may be used to teach left-to-right scanning and memorization of symbols, letters, and words. Motor skills exercises may be used to develop handwriting abilities in a student such that subsequent reading and writing skills may be taught in tandem.
  • Phonology is a language skill relating to the processing of sounds, such as the sounds of individual letter combinations in a word. For example, a literate reader may know that “ph” has the sound of “f” in certain instances (i.e. elephant), but not in other instances (i.e. uphill is not pronounced as “ufill” and shepherd is not pronounced as “sheferd”). The skill of recognizing the proper sounds of letter combinations falls under the category of phonology.
  • Semantics is another language skill and is associated with the meaning of words.
  • the word band refers to a group of musicians, while the word band in the sentence “the girl did not wear the band” refers to a piece of jewelry that can be put on one's body.
  • the skill of phonology may be used to show that the pronunciation of “band” and “band” are identical, but the language skill of semantics enables a student to recognize the different meanings.
  • syntax The language skill relating to the grammar of sentences is referred to as syntax.
  • One example of a syntax skill is the proper usage of the words “they're,” “there,” and “their” in a sentence such as “they're there at their house.”
  • the word “read” may be pronounced as “red” or “reed” depending upon the grammatical construction of the sentence (i.e. “yesterday, they read the magazine,” or “usually, they read the magazine”).
  • the language skill of text is associated with the ability to use combinations of words and sentences to form meaningful messages.
  • a student may be able to read only several words, and those words may not be combined so as to form a statement or sentence.
  • that student learns to read additional words that student must also develop textual skills of combining those words in the appropriate order in order to express a desired message.
  • a literacy system 8 comprises two sections 80 and 90 , which focus on teaching physical skills and language skills, respectively.
  • the literacy system 8 is divided into distinct levels.
  • the literacy system shown in FIG. 1 comprises seven levels 10 , 20 , 30 , 40 , 50 , 60 , and 70 , but the literacy system 8 may include any number of levels.
  • Each level teaches particular skill sets that may be used as building blocks for the following level in the literacy system 8 .
  • the sequencing and motor skills taught in level I 10 and level II 20 may be used as foundations for the language skills taught in subsequent levels 30 , 40 , 50 , 60 , and 70 .
  • sequencing and motor skills are physical skills that may be taught to a student before the student actually begins to read words.
  • Level I 10 teaches sequencing skills that are fundamental to the subsequent skills of reading and writing. Sequencing skills developed in level I 10 include the concept of scanning in a left to right pattern and retaining in memory sequences of letters or symbols.
  • Level II 20 teaches the motor skills of writing letters of the alphabet in a manner that removes the mental “roadblocks” developed by traditional handwriting systems.
  • the section 80 of the literacy system that includes level I 10 and level II 20 is referred to as the pre-reading section 80 because the skills taught in level I 10 and level II 20 may be developed before the student learns to read.
  • Section 90 of the literacy system 8 includes level III 30 , level IV 40 , level V 50 , level VI 60 , and level VII 70 .
  • Each of these levels 30 , 40 , 50 , 60 , and 70 develops the language skills of phonology, semantics, syntax, and text in the context to teaching the student to read and write.
  • section 90 is referred to as the early reading section 90 , or the language skills section 90 , and may include both reading and writing exercises.
  • the difficulty of the reading and writing exercises in each level 30 , 40 , 50 , 60 , and 70 increases as the student progresses to the subsequent level.
  • the reading and writing exercises of each level may be the same, the words used by the literacy system increase in difficulty due to the length, meaning, and grammatical category.
  • the reading and writing exercises of each level may be used to teach the student particular rules or words and develop hidden abilities generally possessed by literate people.
  • one embodiment of the literacy system 8 includes a series of assessment tests 15 , 25 , 35 , 45 , 55 , 65 , and 75 to enable the student to bypass particular levels of teaching where the student has already learned that material.
  • the literacy system 8 may be individually tailored to the needs of particular students using the assessments 15 , 25 , 35 , 45 , 55 , 65 , and 75 . For example, if a student possesses satisfactory sequencing and motor skills but not necessarily language skills, then the assessment-I 15 , assessment-II 25 , and assessment-III 35 may be completed to show that the student should bypass the pre-reading section 80 and begin learning from the literacy system 8 at level III 30 .
  • the student first completes assessment-I 15 to determine if the student's abilities surpass the sequencing skills taught in level I 10 .
  • the assessment-I 15 may include several example and practice exercises similar to those that are used in the actual teaching of level I 10 (described in further detail below). If the student performs satisfactorily during the assessment-I 15 , the literacy system 8 may recommend that the student should bypass the teaching of level I 10 and proceed to assessment-II 25 . However, if the student's performance during assessment-I 15 is not satisfactory, then the literacy system 8 may recommend that the student should begin receiving instruction from level I 10 .
  • assessment-II 25 determines if she already possesses satisfactory motor skills as taught in level II 20 . Again, if the student's motor skills are beyond the teaching of level II 20 , then the student should proceed to assessment-III 35 . Otherwise, the student should complete level II 20 before continuing on to assessment-III 35 . Alternatively, the student may perform both assessment-I 15 and assessment-II 25 at the same time before proceeding to level I 10 , level II 20 , or both. Because a student may have a solid grasp of some pre-reading skills and not others, the assessment-I 15 and assessment-II 25 are not necessarily dependent on one anther.
  • the assessment-I 15 and assessment-II 25 may be grouped as pre-reading assessments 85 .
  • a student may need further instruction on sequencing skills, but that same student may have a satisfactory understanding of the alphabet and handwriting skills.
  • the student may complete assessment-I 15 and assessment-II 25 prior to working on any levels 10 or 20 so as to determine which levels 10 or 20 , if any, should the student bypass before proceeding to assessment-III 35 .
  • the early reading assessments 95 may be developed to be dependent on one another. For example, if a student satisfactorily completes assessment-III 35 but fails to perform as well on the subsequent assessment-IV 45 , then that student should begin to receive instruction from level IV 40 . After that student successfully completes level IV 40 instruction, then the student proceeds directly to level V 50 without the need to complete assessment-V 55 , which results is a more productive use of time. Because level V 50 provides instruction on language skills similar to level IV, but having a greater degree of difficulty, the early reading assessments 95 may be developed so that there is no need to return to the assessments 95 after the student has not satisfactorily completed a particular assessment.
  • the early reading assessments 95 may be implemented such that the student does return to an assessment corresponding to the subsequent level after completing the prior level.
  • the student proceeds through the levels in order. For example, if the early reading assessments 95 lead the student to begin instruction at level III 30 , then the student should proceed to level IV 40 after successfully completing level III 30 . This pattern continues through completion of level VII where the student may then proceed to more advanced instruction 9 beyond the early reading levels 90 .
  • the teaching of the literacy system 8 may be delivered to the student in the format of paper workbooks, video or classroom presentations, computer software, or a combination thereof.
  • the individual reading and writing exercises may be presented in a conventional workbook format such that the exercises occupy individual worksheets in the workbook.
  • the literacy system 8 may alternatively be used as a computer software such that the student interacts with the computer system 105 to complete some or all of the exercises.
  • the literacy system 8 may be executable as a software program stored on a computer readable medium in a computer memory storage device 101 , such as a computer hard drive, a floppy disk drive, a CD-ROM drive, or other conventional devices.
  • the user may utilize a user interface device 102 , such as a keyboard, computer mouse, touchscreen, or a combination thereof, to execute the literacy system 8 from the computer memory storage device 101 using a central processing unit 100 (CPU).
  • the display device 103 may be used to display the various images, instructions, and exercises of the literacy system 8 .
  • the computer system 105 may include an audio speaker device 104 for delivering audible instructions or feedback to the user.
  • a workbook 106 may be used in conjunction with the computer system 105 to provide the student with further instructions and a tangible medium for particular reading and writing exercises.
  • the physical skill of sequencing may be developed through repetition of carefully constructed exercises.
  • sequencing exercises may be taught by the literacy system in level I 10 of the pre-reading section 80 , as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 .
  • the skill of sequencing is not necessarily a natural skill possessed by non-literate students. This is especially true for young children.
  • most other objects that people visually perceive do not require left-to-right sequencing. For example, a car is still a car regardless of whether the student visually perceives it from the left or the right.
  • left-to-right sequencing plays an important role in the difference between the letters “b” and “d”, the letters “p” and “q”, or the words “top” and “pot”.
  • a student who cannot read may be familiar with the letters of the alphabet and give the appearance of knowing how to read sequences of letters. Without the physical skill of sequencing, however, actual reading may not be taking place. This is due to the fact that the student may rely on memorizing the letter names rather than on visually retaining the set of symbols during the sequencing exercises.
  • the use of foreign symbols which cannot be named by the child is one component that may be used by the literacy system 8 to teach visual sequencing. Foreign symbols may be any symbols that are not associated with the letters of the written language taught by the literacy system.
  • a literacy system that teaches the English language may use symbols of the Greek language ( ⁇ , ⁇ , ⁇ , and so forth) as foreign symbols in the sequencing exercises.
  • the use of foreign symbols in sequencing exercises mirrors certain aspects of reading without requiring actual reading.
  • a sequencing exercise 210 the student is shown two rows 211 and 212 of symbols with the top row 211 presenting a short sequence of two symbols 213 ( ⁇ ⁇ ).
  • the symbols 214 ( ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) of the bottom row 212 includes the same two symbols intermingled with additional ones.
  • the bottom row 212 includes all of the symbols as the top row 211 in left-to-right sequence, but the bottom row 212 includes additional symbols intermingled with those from the top row 211 .
  • the student is instructed, via an instructor, a workbook, a computer system, or other instructional means, to view the symbols on the top row 211 . Then the student is instructed to identify the symbols in the bottom row 212 that are the same as the symbols in the top row 211 .
  • the student To successfully complete the individual exercise 210 , the student must identify, in the correct left to right order, to the same two symbols 213 in the bottom row 212 that appear in the top row 212 .
  • This type of sequencing exercise 210 is repeated over several sessions until the student displays a high level of skill. At this point, the student has begun to develop an important hidden ability possessed by literate people. The student is scanning, in a left-to-right order, short sequences of symbols that are not necessarily easy to label.
  • FIGS. 5 A-C One embodiment of the next type of sequencing exercise 220 is shown in FIGS. 5 A-C.
  • This sequencing exercise 220 may be used to develop the skill of retaining in short term memory the sequence of symbols.
  • the exercise 220 includes a top row 221 and a bottom row 222 of symbols 223 and 224 .
  • the exercise 220 may use a covering element 226 , which may be used to cover either the top row 221 or the bottom row 222 of symbols.
  • the sequencing-memory exercise 220 may be practiced using a workbook format, a flash card format, a computer system format, or another convention format. Certain formats, such as a computer format, might eliminate the need of the covering element 226 .
  • the student is instructed to view the symbols 223 in the top row 221 while the symbols 224 of the bottom row 222 are not displayed, as is shown in FIG. 5B .
  • the covering element 226 may be used to cover the bottom row 222 .
  • the symbols 223 from the top row 221 are hidden from the student's view, and the symbols 224 in the bottom row 222 are displayed, as shown in FIG. 5C .
  • the student is instructed to select, in left to right order, the same symbols from the top row 221 that included in the bottom row 224 .
  • the student is working from memory. Without being able to see the top row 221 , the student is forced to make the correct selection is by retaining an image of the original pattern, which develops a hidden ability possessed by literate people to memorize sequences of symbols.
  • the literacy system 8 may revert back to sequencing exercises of direct matching with no memory demands, similar to that of FIG. 4 .
  • the literacy system 8 begins to incorporate new, slightly more complex content after the student has shown a mastery of less complex content.
  • the literacy system 8 continues to systematically use the less complex skills attained by the student when exposing the student to slightly more complex content.
  • one embodiment of such a sequencing exercise 230 includes two rows 231 and 232 of symbols with the top row 231 presenting a sequence of four symbols 233 .
  • the bottom row 232 includes all of the symbols as the top row 231 in left-to-right sequence, but the bottom row 232 includes additional symbols intermingled with those from the top row 231 .
  • the student is instructed to identify the symbols in the bottom row 232 that are the same as the symbols in the top row 231 .
  • the student To successfully complete the individual exercise 230 , the student must identify, in the correct left to right order, to the same two symbols 233 in the bottom row 232 that appear in the top row 232 .
  • FIGS. 7 A-C show another embodiment of a sequencing exercise 240 using a sequence of four symbols.
  • the exercise 240 includes a top row 241 and a bottom row 242 of symbols 243 and 244 . Similar to the exercise 220 shown in FIGS. 5 A-C, the student is instructed to view the symbols 243 in the top row 241 while the symbols 244 of the bottom row 242 are not displayed, as is shown in FIG. 7B .
  • the covering element 246 may be used to cover the bottom row 242 .
  • the symbols 243 from the top row 241 are hidden from the student's view, and the symbols 244 in the bottom row 242 are displayed, as shown in FIG. 7C . Without looking back to the symbols 243 in the top row 241 , the student is instructed to select, in left to right order, the same symbols from the top row 241 that included in the bottom row 244 .
  • the visual sequencing exercises may be implemented using a computer system. As shown in FIG. 8 , a series of functions 250 may be performed by the computer system so as to enable the student to practice the sequencing exercises.
  • the computer system may display a first array of symbols, as shown in step 251 . In this example, the symbols are the same foreign symbols shown in FIG. 6 .
  • the next step 252 displays a second array of symbols.
  • the first array may be displayed while the second array is also displayed such that the student performs direct matching exercises. Otherwise, the first array of symbols may be removed from display while the second array is displayed such that the student performs the sequencing exercise using memorization of the symbols.
  • the computer system receives the student's selection of symbols.
  • the student may input the selection using a user interface device, as previously described.
  • the computer system determines whether the student's selection of symbols from the second array correctly matches, in left-to-right order, the symbols from the first array.
  • the computer system outputs an indicator informing the student of the correct selection, such as a visual indicator on a computer screen or an audible indicator from a speaker.
  • the computer system If the student's selection was incorrect, then the computer system outputs an indicator informing the student of the incorrect selection, as shown in step 256 . In such a case, the computer system may repeat the steps 251 , 252 , 253 , and 254 so that the student may retry the identical sequencing exercise.
  • the motor skills exercises may be taught in level II 20 of the pre-reading section 80 , as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 .
  • One reason for teaching a student to effectively write letters prior to reading, or at the start thereof, is that the student may then be able to write any word that she reads. Reading and writing may then be practiced in tandem, each promoting the other.
  • the alphabet generally receives significant attention in the area of early literacy instruction. For example, young children are exposed to the alphabet via letters printed on toys, discussed in songs, or used in children's games.
  • the literacy system 8 may include certain aspects to develop these intricate motor skills, such as an early emphasis on lower case letters (in contrast to the emphasis on upper case letters in most early instruction) or sequencing handwriting exercises from simple to complex letter shapes (not by letters in alphabetical order).
  • the student is not necessarily instructed to practice handwriting of letters in alphabetical order.
  • Learning to write letters in alphabetical order i.e. practicing the letter “a” prior to practicing the letter “b” may seem more instinctual to a literate person who was previously instructed in this manner or to prior art systems, but the letters “a” and “b” are relative complex shapes compared to other letters.
  • the literacy system 8 may use exercises of handwriting the letters in order of motor skill simplicity. As such, letters with simpler shape, size and placement may be practiced during the initial steps of the motor skills exercises, and after the student has successfully learned to write these letters, the exercises proceed to teaching letters of more complex shape.
  • the motor skills exercises emphasize the use of lower case letters in writing.
  • capital letters dominate the early handwriting training, or at least play an overly-prominent role, which cause students to focus on the less commonly used capital letters and to develop poor habits.
  • less fewer than 1% of the letters on pages read by early reading students appear as capital letters, which may lead to conflict between their reading systems and writing systems.
  • the inventive literacy system 8 highlights the similarities between reading and writing, not necessarily the differences.
  • FIG. 9 One embodiment of motor skills exercises of the literacy system 8 is shown in FIG. 9 .
  • the motor skills exercises are divided into seven steps 310 , 320 , 330 , 340 , 350 , 360 , and 370 , wherein four steps 310 , 320 , 340 , and 360 introduce new letters of the alphabet to the student.
  • Letters composed of single shapes (c, i, j, l, and o) are introduced to the student in the first step 310 .
  • the student may produce each letter by modeling movements of an instructor, such as a human instructor, an image displayed from a computer system, or the like.
  • the student is introduced to exercises involving double-shape letters (e, f, k, s, and t), but these letters are produced in separate actions.
  • the letter “e” may be constructed with two separate actions: a small horizontal line (-) and a curved shape (C).
  • the student would model the horizontal line (-) after the instructor's line, and then the student would model the curved shape (C) after the instructor's action.
  • the single-shaped letters that were practiced in the previous step 310 are continued in the handwriting exercises of step 320 .
  • the third step 330 does not introduce new letters, but instead the letters from steps 310 and 320 are produced by the student using a single action. Unlike the previous example of using separate actions to produce the letter “e,” this step 330 of the motor skills exercises requires the student to model the letter “e” in a single action after the instructor initially produces the letter in a single action.
  • the next step 340 in the motor skills exercises proceeds to more complex letters that require a retracing action. For example, the letter “n” requires a vertical line (
  • the letters requiring a retracing action that are practiced in step 340 include a, b, g, n, p, r, y, and w. Each of these letters is produced by the student using separate actions, such as the downward vertical line (
  • Step 350 is similar to the previous step 330 , in which all of the letters previously taught are practiced using single actions. However, step 350 includes the letters that were practiced in step 340 (a, b, g, n, p, r, y, and w).
  • Step 360 introduces the remaining letters of the alphabet that have not yet been introduced (d, h, m, q, u, v, x, and z), including some letters that do not require retracing actions (x and z).
  • Each newly introduced letter is produced by the student using separate actions, as described in previous examples.
  • previously practiced letters are included in the exercises of step 360 so as to review prior material with steady additions of new material.
  • step 370 includes exercises involving all letters, but the student is required to complete each letter using a single action.
  • FIG. 10 shows one embodiment of the steps 310 , 320 , 330 , 340 , 350 , 360 , and 370 used in the motor skills exercises of the literacy system 8 .
  • Each step includes sessions in which the student produces certain letters in a particular order.
  • step 310 includes three sessions 311 , 312 , and 313 , which provide exercises for writing the single-shaped letters in a certain order.
  • the student is not necessarily required to write the same letter in a repetitive manner, but instead the student shifts from one single-shaped letter to the next so as to resemble actual reading and writing skills.
  • the student may be required to complete each session 311 , 312 , and 313 up to six times for a total of eighteen sessions, at which point the student may proceed to the next step 320 .
  • the sessions 321 , 322 , and 323 of step 320 in FIG. 10 show the intermingling of single-shaped letters (c, i, j, l, and o) with double-shaped letters (e, f, k, s, and t) throughout the exercise.
  • Certain letters in step 320 may be completed by the student using separate actions.
  • one embodiment of the motor skills exercises may require the student to complete each session 321 , 322 , and 323 up to six times for a total of eighteen sessions. After the student has completed the required sessions, then the student may proceed to the subsequent step 330 .
  • the pattern continues in a similar manner until the student has completed the required sessions through step 370 , at which point the student has completed the motor skills exercises of the pre-reading section 85 of the literacy system 8 .
  • FIG. 11 An exemplary embodiment of a literacy system 408 is shown in FIG. 11 , which may be implemented using a computer system, a workbook, an instructional video or classroom presentation, or a combination thereof. Similar to the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 , the literacy system 408 teaches the skills of visual sequencing, motor skills, phonology, semantics, syntax, and text via multiple levels of instruction.
  • the first section termed “Get Set” 480 , teaches visual sequencing and motor skills of alphabet writing through two preparation levels: “Sequences to Sight” 410 and “Letters to Write” 420 . While both levels 410 and 420 are building blocks for the subsequent levels, they may be independent from each other such that one does not build upon the other.
  • the subsequent levels 430 , 440 , 450 , 460 , and 470 teach the language skills of phonology, semantics, syntax, and text while building upon the visual sequencing and motor skills covered in “Get Set” 480 .
  • the level progression includes “Boarding” 430 , “Runway” 440 , “Liftoff” 450 , “Airborne” 460 , and “Soaring” 470 , and the exercises increase in difficulty with each subsequent level.
  • These levels may not isolate each of the language skills in different exercises, but instead the language skills section 490 combines the four language skills (phonology, semantics, syntax, and text) in exercises using content words, non-content words, and books. The content steadily increases in complexity so that with each succeeding level, the words become more intricate, the concepts more abstract, the sentences longer, and the books richer.
  • a set of skill checks 415 , 425 , 435 , 445 , 455 , 465 , and 475 assess the student's ability such that the student may bypass levels that teach content already known by the student. Similar to the literacy system 8 of FIG. 2 , the student may bypass levels by successfully completing skill checks until a particular skill check suggests that the student completes a certain level.
  • the literacy system 408 may be implemented such that the student progresses through the subsequent levels without returning to the skill checks. Alternatively, the literacy system 408 may be implemented such that the student returns to the skill checks on a regular basis to determine if any subsequent levels may be bypassed.

Abstract

A literacy system provides teaching for reading and writing skills. In one embodiment, the literacy system may include exercises for teaching visual sequencing, motor skills, phonology, semantics, syntax, and text. The literacy system may have a pre-reading section, which includes exercises for developing visual sequencing skills and motor skills prior to teaching the skills of reading and writing words.

Description

    REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is a division of pending U.S. patent applications Ser. No. 10/350,849 entitled “Literacy System” and filed on Jan. 24, 2003, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/362,749 entitled “Literacy System,” filed on Mar. 7, 2002. The contents of these prior applications are herein incorporated by reference.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • This invention relates to a system of literacy education, and more particularly to methods and systems for teaching reading and writing skills.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Literacy is a skill often taken for granted even though mastery of that skill eludes millions of people from all age groups. For those that are literate, an intricate set of skills enable reading and writing to be smooth and automatic processes. This set of skills, referred to as “hidden abilities,” generally appear first at a young age when a person begins to comprehend the speech of others and when that person begins to speak. For example, even a young child may know that the statement “I am looking at she” is incorrect while the statement “I am looking at her” is proper. Generally, any individual does not know the technical reason behind the proper version, but instead, may offer the rationale that “it just sounds right.” (The technical reason is that when a pronoun referring to a feminine individual is used as the object of a preposition, the correct form of the pronoun is “her,” not “she.”) This example illustrates the essence of the hidden abilities that allow a literate person to do amazingly intricate constructions with language without knowing why. These same abilities are constantly operating in written language as well. For example, in a sentence such as The soldier decided to desert in the desert. a skilled reader automatically uses different pronunciations for the two instances of the identically spelled word. For people who are not literate, and especially for young children, these hidden abilities must be developed via literacy education. However, modem systems for teaching literacy fail to address the full range of necessary skills to promote the development of hidden abilities.
  • In general, two major systems dominate the literacy education field: phonics and whole language. Phonics emphasizes the skill of converting the letters on a page into sounds that become real words (i.e. teaching children to read a word by “sounding out” each letter so that c-a-t becomes “cat”). The processing of sounds falls under a language category known as phonology. The phonics system seems logical because phonology is a significant element in reading, but in practice, phonics teaching is hindered by the complexities of the English language. Phonics relies on teaching that each letter makes a single, distinctive sound. The reality, however, is that this concept holds true for only a tiny fraction of English words. Indeed, of the seventeen words in the preceding sentence, not a single one meets this criterion. The problem is illustrated by the fact that, under the phonics system of teaching, the word “phonics” itself should be spelled “foniks.” In order to overcome this problem, the system relies on children memorizing hundreds of rules, such as the “silent e” rule, the double vowel rule, and the consonant combination rules. However, the memorization of these rules and “sounding out” individual letters may cause reading and writing to be a laborious process and may discourage individual students. The whole language system of teaching literacy focuses on complete stories or groups of words to form meaningful messages, which is different from the phonics system that concentrates on the dissection of individual words. However, children in early stages of reading may encounter a wider range of words that they can mange. As such, the situation may appear overwhelming to the student.
  • The prevailing assumption is that these two systems, in combination, address all of the skills necessary to literacy. Unfortunately, these two systems, alone or in combination, cover only a portion of the skills that reading requires. The skills that are not addressed by these systems may leave gaps in the literacy education that many students are able to overcome. For those students who are not able to overcome the gaps of the current literacy systems, reading and writing may become a frustrating activity that is to be avoided.
  • Among the components needed for an effective literacy system are ones that develop the pre-reading skills of visual sequencing and fine motor abilities.
  • SUMMARY
  • In one embodiment, a system for teaching skills associated with literacy can include a pre-reading section having visual sequencing exercises. The visual sequencing exercises can include foreign symbols.
  • In another embodiment, a system for teaching skills associated with literacy can include a pre-reading section having motor skills exercises. The motor skills exercises can teach handwriting of letters in order of motor skill simplicity. For example, the motor skills exercises may begin teaching handwriting with single-shaped letters.
  • The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
  • DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a chart depicting aspects of one embodiment of a literacy system in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the literacy system of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of a computer system that may be used to operate the literacy system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is an image of a visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGS. 5A-C is a series of images showing another visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 is an image of a visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 7A-C is a series of images of a visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart of instructions for a visual sequencing exercise in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of motor skills exercises in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of a further embodiment of the motor skills exercises of FIG. 9.
  • FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of a further embodiment of the literacy system of FIG. 2.
  • Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Certain embodiments of the invention teach one or all of the following skills associated with total competence in literacy:
  • (1) sequencing—the ability to read, and retain, letters in the appropriate order,
  • (2) motor skills—the hand-eye coordination required for writing,
  • (3) phonology—the ability to recognize and produce the sounds of letters,
  • (4) semantics—comprehension of the meaning of words,
  • (5) syntax—the ability to recognize and use grammar, and
  • (6) text—combining words to form meaningful messages.
  • Sequencing and motor skills are both types of physical skills associated with reading and writing, as described later in more detail. Briefly, visual sequencing exercises may be used to teach left-to-right scanning and memorization of symbols, letters, and words. Motor skills exercises may be used to develop handwriting abilities in a student such that subsequent reading and writing skills may be taught in tandem.
  • Phonology is a language skill relating to the processing of sounds, such as the sounds of individual letter combinations in a word. For example, a literate reader may know that “ph” has the sound of “f” in certain instances (i.e. elephant), but not in other instances (i.e. uphill is not pronounced as “ufill” and shepherd is not pronounced as “sheferd”). The skill of recognizing the proper sounds of letter combinations falls under the category of phonology.
  • Semantics is another language skill and is associated with the meaning of words. For example, in the statement “the girl did not hear the band,” the word band refers to a group of musicians, while the word band in the sentence “the girl did not wear the band” refers to a piece of jewelry that can be put on one's body. The skill of phonology may be used to show that the pronunciation of “band” and “band” are identical, but the language skill of semantics enables a student to recognize the different meanings.
  • The language skill relating to the grammar of sentences is referred to as syntax. One example of a syntax skill is the proper usage of the words “they're,” “there,” and “their” in a sentence such as “they're there at their house.” In another example, the word “read” may be pronounced as “red” or “reed” depending upon the grammatical construction of the sentence (i.e. “yesterday, they read the magazine,” or “usually, they read the magazine”).
  • Lastly, the language skill of text is associated with the ability to use combinations of words and sentences to form meaningful messages. In the early stages of learning to read, a student may be able to read only several words, and those words may not be combined so as to form a statement or sentence. As that student learns to read additional words, that student must also develop textual skills of combining those words in the appropriate order in order to express a desired message.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, as shown in FIG. 1, a literacy system 8 comprises two sections 80 and 90, which focus on teaching physical skills and language skills, respectively. The literacy system 8 is divided into distinct levels. By way of example, the literacy system shown in FIG. 1 comprises seven levels 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70, but the literacy system 8 may include any number of levels. Each level teaches particular skill sets that may be used as building blocks for the following level in the literacy system 8. For example, the sequencing and motor skills taught in level I 10 and level II 20, respectively, may be used as foundations for the language skills taught in subsequent levels 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70.
  • In general, sequencing and motor skills are physical skills that may be taught to a student before the student actually begins to read words. Level I 10 teaches sequencing skills that are fundamental to the subsequent skills of reading and writing. Sequencing skills developed in level I 10 include the concept of scanning in a left to right pattern and retaining in memory sequences of letters or symbols. Level II 20 teaches the motor skills of writing letters of the alphabet in a manner that removes the mental “roadblocks” developed by traditional handwriting systems. The section 80 of the literacy system that includes level I 10 and level II 20 is referred to as the pre-reading section 80 because the skills taught in level I 10 and level II 20 may be developed before the student learns to read.
  • Section 90 of the literacy system 8 includes level III 30, level IV 40, level V 50, level VI 60, and level VII 70. Each of these levels 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 develops the language skills of phonology, semantics, syntax, and text in the context to teaching the student to read and write. Thus, section 90 is referred to as the early reading section 90, or the language skills section 90, and may include both reading and writing exercises. The difficulty of the reading and writing exercises in each level 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 increases as the student progresses to the subsequent level. Although the reading and writing exercises of each level may be the same, the words used by the literacy system increase in difficulty due to the length, meaning, and grammatical category. The reading and writing exercises of each level may be used to teach the student particular rules or words and develop hidden abilities generally possessed by literate people.
  • Referring to FIG. 2, one embodiment of the literacy system 8 includes a series of assessment tests 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, and 75 to enable the student to bypass particular levels of teaching where the student has already learned that material. The literacy system 8 may be individually tailored to the needs of particular students using the assessments 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, and 75. For example, if a student possesses satisfactory sequencing and motor skills but not necessarily language skills, then the assessment-I 15, assessment-II 25, and assessment-III 35 may be completed to show that the student should bypass the pre-reading section 80 and begin learning from the literacy system 8 at level III 30.
  • As shown in FIG. 2, the student first completes assessment-I 15 to determine if the student's abilities surpass the sequencing skills taught in level I 10. The assessment-I 15 may include several example and practice exercises similar to those that are used in the actual teaching of level I 10 (described in further detail below). If the student performs satisfactorily during the assessment-I 15, the literacy system 8 may recommend that the student should bypass the teaching of level I 10 and proceed to assessment-II 25. However, if the student's performance during assessment-I 15 is not satisfactory, then the literacy system 8 may recommend that the student should begin receiving instruction from level I 10.
  • After the student satisfactorily completes assessment-I 15, or after the student satisfactorily completes level I 10, the student then proceeds to assessment-II 25 to determine if she already possesses satisfactory motor skills as taught in level II 20. Again, if the student's motor skills are beyond the teaching of level II 20, then the student should proceed to assessment-III 35. Otherwise, the student should complete level II 20 before continuing on to assessment-III 35. Alternatively, the student may perform both assessment-I 15 and assessment-II 25 at the same time before proceeding to level I 10, level II 20, or both. Because a student may have a solid grasp of some pre-reading skills and not others, the assessment-I 15 and assessment-II 25 are not necessarily dependent on one anther. For this reason, the assessment-I 15 and assessment-II 25 may be grouped as pre-reading assessments 85. For example, a student may need further instruction on sequencing skills, but that same student may have a satisfactory understanding of the alphabet and handwriting skills. As such, the student may complete assessment-I 15 and assessment-II 25 prior to working on any levels 10 or 20 so as to determine which levels 10 or 20, if any, should the student bypass before proceeding to assessment-III 35.
  • If the student satisfactorily completes assessment-III 35 to show that she possess language skills beyond the teaching of level III 30, then that student should proceed to assessment-IV. This pattern continues until the student does not satisfactorily complete an assessment 35, 45, 55, 65, or 75, in which case that student proceeds to receive instruction from the appropriate level 30, 40, 50, 60, or 70. If the student satisfactorily completes all of the early reading assessments 95, then that student should proceed to more advanced instruction 9 beyond the early reading sections 90.
  • Because level III 30 through level VII 70 teach the same type of skills while increasing in difficulty, the early reading assessments 95 may be developed to be dependent on one another. For example, if a student satisfactorily completes assessment-III 35 but fails to perform as well on the subsequent assessment-IV 45, then that student should begin to receive instruction from level IV 40. After that student successfully completes level IV 40 instruction, then the student proceeds directly to level V 50 without the need to complete assessment-V 55, which results is a more productive use of time. Because level V 50 provides instruction on language skills similar to level IV, but having a greater degree of difficulty, the early reading assessments 95 may be developed so that there is no need to return to the assessments 95 after the student has not satisfactorily completed a particular assessment. One reason for this is that a student who does not possess language skills for a particular set of words is unlikely to possess those same language skills (phonology, semantics, syntax, and text) for words having a greater degree of difficulty. Alternatively, the early reading assessments 95 may be implemented such that the student does return to an assessment corresponding to the subsequent level after completing the prior level.
  • Once the early reading assessments 95 lead the student to the appropriate starting level 30, 40, 50, 60, or 70 for that individual, the student proceeds through the levels in order. For example, if the early reading assessments 95 lead the student to begin instruction at level III 30, then the student should proceed to level IV 40 after successfully completing level III 30. This pattern continues through completion of level VII where the student may then proceed to more advanced instruction 9 beyond the early reading levels 90.
  • The teaching of the literacy system 8 may be delivered to the student in the format of paper workbooks, video or classroom presentations, computer software, or a combination thereof. For example, the individual reading and writing exercises may be presented in a conventional workbook format such that the exercises occupy individual worksheets in the workbook. As shown in FIG. 3, the literacy system 8 may alternatively be used as a computer software such that the student interacts with the computer system 105 to complete some or all of the exercises. In one embodiment, the literacy system 8 may be executable as a software program stored on a computer readable medium in a computer memory storage device 101, such as a computer hard drive, a floppy disk drive, a CD-ROM drive, or other conventional devices. The user may utilize a user interface device 102, such as a keyboard, computer mouse, touchscreen, or a combination thereof, to execute the literacy system 8 from the computer memory storage device 101 using a central processing unit 100 (CPU). The display device 103 may be used to display the various images, instructions, and exercises of the literacy system 8. The computer system 105 may include an audio speaker device 104 for delivering audible instructions or feedback to the user. In addition to the computer system 105, a workbook 106 may be used in conjunction with the computer system 105 to provide the student with further instructions and a tangible medium for particular reading and writing exercises.
  • Returning to the description of the pre-reading section 80 of the literacy system 8, the physical skill of sequencing may be developed through repetition of carefully constructed exercises. In one embodiment of the literacy system 8, sequencing exercises may be taught by the literacy system in level I 10 of the pre-reading section 80, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. While scanning from left to right to read letters may seem automatic to most literate people, the skill of sequencing is not necessarily a natural skill possessed by non-literate students. This is especially true for young children. Unlike the sequencing of letters to form words, most other objects that people visually perceive do not require left-to-right sequencing. For example, a car is still a car regardless of whether the student visually perceives it from the left or the right. From the perspective of a young child who has spent her past 4 or 5 years learning to overlook the left-to-right sequencing of objects, learning a language in which the sequence of objects forms the basis of understanding may be a daunting task. Even minute changes in the left-to-right sequence of letters may cause critical changes to the meaning of the letter or word. For example, left-to-right sequencing plays an important role in the difference between the letters “b” and “d”, the letters “p” and “q”, or the words “top” and “pot”. Despite the fact that left-to-write sequencing is a critical skill required for reading and writing, the dominant view among literacy systems is that students will “pick it up.” While some students do glean the necessary skills without instruction, those students who do not “pick it up” often experience frustration and displeasure with learning to read and write.
  • A student who cannot read may be familiar with the letters of the alphabet and give the appearance of knowing how to read sequences of letters. Without the physical skill of sequencing, however, actual reading may not be taking place. This is due to the fact that the student may rely on memorizing the letter names rather than on visually retaining the set of symbols during the sequencing exercises. As such, the use of foreign symbols which cannot be named by the child is one component that may be used by the literacy system 8 to teach visual sequencing. Foreign symbols may be any symbols that are not associated with the letters of the written language taught by the literacy system. In one example, a literacy system that teaches the English language may use symbols of the Greek language (α, β, γ, and so forth) as foreign symbols in the sequencing exercises. The use of foreign symbols in sequencing exercises mirrors certain aspects of reading without requiring actual reading.
  • Visual sequencing may be so novel to a student that even sequences of two elements may be problematic. Therefore, the initial sequencing exercises of the literacy system 8 begin with short patterns of two or three symbols that will be easiest for the student, as shown in FIG. 4. In one embodiment of a sequencing exercise 210, the student is shown two rows 211 and 212 of symbols with the top row 211 presenting a short sequence of two symbols 213 (δ φ). The symbols 214 (γ δ φ λ) of the bottom row 212 includes the same two symbols intermingled with additional ones. Thus, the bottom row 212 includes all of the symbols as the top row 211 in left-to-right sequence, but the bottom row 212 includes additional symbols intermingled with those from the top row 211. The student is instructed, via an instructor, a workbook, a computer system, or other instructional means, to view the symbols on the top row 211. Then the student is instructed to identify the symbols in the bottom row 212 that are the same as the symbols in the top row 211. To successfully complete the individual exercise 210, the student must identify, in the correct left to right order, to the same two symbols 213 in the bottom row 212 that appear in the top row 212. This type of sequencing exercise 210 is repeated over several sessions until the student displays a high level of skill. At this point, the student has begun to develop an important hidden ability possessed by literate people. The student is scanning, in a left-to-right order, short sequences of symbols that are not necessarily easy to label.
  • One embodiment of the next type of sequencing exercise 220 is shown in FIGS. 5A-C. This sequencing exercise 220 may be used to develop the skill of retaining in short term memory the sequence of symbols. The exercise 220 includes a top row 221 and a bottom row 222 of symbols 223 and 224. In addition, the exercise 220 may use a covering element 226, which may be used to cover either the top row 221 or the bottom row 222 of symbols. The sequencing-memory exercise 220 may be practiced using a workbook format, a flash card format, a computer system format, or another convention format. Certain formats, such as a computer format, might eliminate the need of the covering element 226.
  • To successfully complete the exercise 220, the student is instructed to view the symbols 223 in the top row 221 while the symbols 224 of the bottom row 222 are not displayed, as is shown in FIG. 5B. The covering element 226 may be used to cover the bottom row 222. Then, the symbols 223 from the top row 221 are hidden from the student's view, and the symbols 224 in the bottom row 222 are displayed, as shown in FIG. 5C. Without looking back to the symbols 223 in the top row 221, the student is instructed to select, in left to right order, the same symbols from the top row 221 that included in the bottom row 224. At this point, the student is working from memory. Without being able to see the top row 221, the student is forced to make the correct selection is by retaining an image of the original pattern, which develops a hidden ability possessed by literate people to memorize sequences of symbols.
  • After the student has become accustomed to retaining sequences of two and three symbols, the patterns increase to four symbols. While four symbols are merely one more than three, it may represent a significant leap in difficulty for the student. When the longer patterns are introduced, the literacy system 8 may revert back to sequencing exercises of direct matching with no memory demands, similar to that of FIG. 4. This is an example of a teaching principal that uses review of prior material with steady additions of new material. In such a case, the literacy system 8 begins to incorporate new, slightly more complex content after the student has shown a mastery of less complex content. However, the literacy system 8 continues to systematically use the less complex skills attained by the student when exposing the student to slightly more complex content.
  • As shown in FIG. 6, one embodiment of such a sequencing exercise 230 includes two rows 231 and 232 of symbols with the top row 231 presenting a sequence of four symbols 233. Similar to the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, the bottom row 232 includes all of the symbols as the top row 231 in left-to-right sequence, but the bottom row 232 includes additional symbols intermingled with those from the top row 231. The student is instructed to identify the symbols in the bottom row 232 that are the same as the symbols in the top row 231. To successfully complete the individual exercise 230, the student must identify, in the correct left to right order, to the same two symbols 233 in the bottom row 232 that appear in the top row 232.
  • FIGS. 7A-C show another embodiment of a sequencing exercise 240 using a sequence of four symbols. In this exercise 240 the student progresses to memorization of sequences having four symbols. The exercise 240 includes a top row 241 and a bottom row 242 of symbols 243 and 244. Similar to the exercise 220 shown in FIGS. 5A-C, the student is instructed to view the symbols 243 in the top row 241 while the symbols 244 of the bottom row 242 are not displayed, as is shown in FIG. 7B. The covering element 246 may be used to cover the bottom row 242. Then, the symbols 243 from the top row 241 are hidden from the student's view, and the symbols 244 in the bottom row 242 are displayed, as shown in FIG. 7C. Without looking back to the symbols 243 in the top row 241, the student is instructed to select, in left to right order, the same symbols from the top row 241 that included in the bottom row 244.
  • In accordance with one embodiment of the literacy system 8, the visual sequencing exercises may be implemented using a computer system. As shown in FIG. 8, a series of functions 250 may be performed by the computer system so as to enable the student to practice the sequencing exercises. The computer system may display a first array of symbols, as shown in step 251. In this example, the symbols are the same foreign symbols shown in FIG. 6. The next step 252 displays a second array of symbols. Depending on the type of visual sequencing exercise that is used, the first array may be displayed while the second array is also displayed such that the student performs direct matching exercises. Otherwise, the first array of symbols may be removed from display while the second array is displayed such that the student performs the sequencing exercise using memorization of the symbols. The student is instructed to identify, in left-to-right order, the symbols in the second array that match those of the first array. In step 253, the computer system receives the student's selection of symbols. The student may input the selection using a user interface device, as previously described. In step 254, the computer system determines whether the student's selection of symbols from the second array correctly matches, in left-to-right order, the symbols from the first array. As shown in step 255, if the student's selection was correct, then the computer system outputs an indicator informing the student of the correct selection, such as a visual indicator on a computer screen or an audible indicator from a speaker. If the student's selection was incorrect, then the computer system outputs an indicator informing the student of the incorrect selection, as shown in step 256. In such a case, the computer system may repeat the steps 251, 252, 253, and 254 so that the student may retry the identical sequencing exercise.
  • Other physical skills that may be taught in the pre-reading section 80 of the literacy system 8 are the motor skills associated with writing. In one embodiment of the literacy system 8, the motor skills exercises may be taught in level II 20 of the pre-reading section 80, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. One reason for teaching a student to effectively write letters prior to reading, or at the start thereof, is that the student may then be able to write any word that she reads. Reading and writing may then be practiced in tandem, each promoting the other. Unlike the skills of visual sequencing, the alphabet generally receives significant attention in the area of early literacy instruction. For example, young children are exposed to the alphabet via letters printed on toys, discussed in songs, or used in children's games. While exposing young children to the alphabet may encourage their tendency to learn reading, the act of writing those same letters calls upon a range of intricate motor skills, which may be difficult to master. As described below, the literacy system 8 may include certain aspects to develop these intricate motor skills, such as an early emphasis on lower case letters (in contrast to the emphasis on upper case letters in most early instruction) or sequencing handwriting exercises from simple to complex letter shapes (not by letters in alphabetical order).
  • In accordance with one aspect of the inventive literacy system 8, the student is not necessarily instructed to practice handwriting of letters in alphabetical order. Learning to write letters in alphabetical order (i.e. practicing the letter “a” prior to practicing the letter “b”) may seem more instinctual to a literate person who was previously instructed in this manner or to prior art systems, but the letters “a” and “b” are relative complex shapes compared to other letters. Instead, the literacy system 8 may use exercises of handwriting the letters in order of motor skill simplicity. As such, letters with simpler shape, size and placement may be practiced during the initial steps of the motor skills exercises, and after the student has successfully learned to write these letters, the exercises proceed to teaching letters of more complex shape.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the inventive literacy system 8, the motor skills exercises emphasize the use of lower case letters in writing. In prior art systems, capital letters dominate the early handwriting training, or at least play an overly-prominent role, which cause students to focus on the less commonly used capital letters and to develop poor habits. By some estimates, less fewer than 1% of the letters on pages read by early reading students appear as capital letters, which may lead to conflict between their reading systems and writing systems. The inventive literacy system 8 highlights the similarities between reading and writing, not necessarily the differences.
  • One embodiment of motor skills exercises of the literacy system 8 is shown in FIG. 9. The motor skills exercises are divided into seven steps 310, 320, 330, 340, 350, 360, and 370, wherein four steps 310, 320, 340, and 360 introduce new letters of the alphabet to the student. Letters composed of single shapes (c, i, j, l, and o) are introduced to the student in the first step 310. The student may produce each letter by modeling movements of an instructor, such as a human instructor, an image displayed from a computer system, or the like. In the next step 320, the student is introduced to exercises involving double-shape letters (e, f, k, s, and t), but these letters are produced in separate actions. For example, the letter “e” may be constructed with two separate actions: a small horizontal line (-) and a curved shape (C). In such a case, the student would model the horizontal line (-) after the instructor's line, and then the student would model the curved shape (C) after the instructor's action. In keeping with the teaching principal of reviewing prior materials with steady additions of new material, the single-shaped letters that were practiced in the previous step 310 are continued in the handwriting exercises of step 320.
  • The third step 330 does not introduce new letters, but instead the letters from steps 310 and 320 are produced by the student using a single action. Unlike the previous example of using separate actions to produce the letter “e,” this step 330 of the motor skills exercises requires the student to model the letter “e” in a single action after the instructor initially produces the letter in a single action. The next step 340 in the motor skills exercises proceeds to more complex letters that require a retracing action. For example, the letter “n” requires a vertical line (|) in the downward direction with a retracing action over part of the vertical line in the upward direction before completing the letter with a curved shape (
    Figure US20070031796A1-20070208-P00900
    ). The letters requiring a retracing action that are practiced in step 340 include a, b, g, n, p, r, y, and w. Each of these letters is produced by the student using separate actions, such as the downward vertical line (|) for the letter “n” followed by the vertical retracing action in combination with the curved shape (
    Figure US20070031796A1-20070208-P00900
    ). Again, the teaching principal of reviewing prior materials with steady additions of new material is utilized so that the letters from previous step 330 are continued in the handwriting exercises of step 340. Step 350 is similar to the previous step 330, in which all of the letters previously taught are practiced using single actions. However, step 350 includes the letters that were practiced in step 340 (a, b, g, n, p, r, y, and w).
  • So as not to overload the student, the letters which require retracing are introduced in two different steps 340 and 360. Step 360 introduces the remaining letters of the alphabet that have not yet been introduced (d, h, m, q, u, v, x, and z), including some letters that do not require retracing actions (x and z). Each newly introduced letter is produced by the student using separate actions, as described in previous examples. Also, previously practiced letters are included in the exercises of step 360 so as to review prior material with steady additions of new material. Subsequently, step 370 includes exercises involving all letters, but the student is required to complete each letter using a single action.
  • FIG. 10 shows one embodiment of the steps 310, 320, 330, 340, 350, 360, and 370 used in the motor skills exercises of the literacy system 8. Each step includes sessions in which the student produces certain letters in a particular order. For example, step 310 includes three sessions 311, 312, and 313, which provide exercises for writing the single-shaped letters in a certain order. The student is not necessarily required to write the same letter in a repetitive manner, but instead the student shifts from one single-shaped letter to the next so as to resemble actual reading and writing skills. In one embodiment, the student may be required to complete each session 311, 312, and 313 up to six times for a total of eighteen sessions, at which point the student may proceed to the next step 320.
  • The sessions 321, 322, and 323 of step 320 in FIG. 10 show the intermingling of single-shaped letters (c, i, j, l, and o) with double-shaped letters (e, f, k, s, and t) throughout the exercise. Certain letters in step 320 (i, j, e, f, k, s, and t) may be completed by the student using separate actions. Again, one embodiment of the motor skills exercises may require the student to complete each session 321, 322, and 323 up to six times for a total of eighteen sessions. After the student has completed the required sessions, then the student may proceed to the subsequent step 330. The pattern continues in a similar manner until the student has completed the required sessions through step 370, at which point the student has completed the motor skills exercises of the pre-reading section 85 of the literacy system 8.
  • An exemplary embodiment of a literacy system 408 is shown in FIG. 11, which may be implemented using a computer system, a workbook, an instructional video or classroom presentation, or a combination thereof. Similar to the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the literacy system 408 teaches the skills of visual sequencing, motor skills, phonology, semantics, syntax, and text via multiple levels of instruction. The first section, termed “Get Set” 480, teaches visual sequencing and motor skills of alphabet writing through two preparation levels: “Sequences to Sight” 410 and “Letters to Write” 420. While both levels 410 and 420 are building blocks for the subsequent levels, they may be independent from each other such that one does not build upon the other. For example, a student may already have the satisfactory motor skills in handwriting, but may not have satisfactory sequencing skills. In such a case, the “Sequences to Sight” Skills Check 415 and the “Letters to Write” Skills Check 425 would show that the student should complete “Sequences to Sight” 410 while bypassing “Letters to Write” 420.
  • The subsequent levels 430, 440, 450, 460, and 470 teach the language skills of phonology, semantics, syntax, and text while building upon the visual sequencing and motor skills covered in “Get Set” 480. The level progression includes “Boarding” 430, “Runway” 440, “Liftoff” 450, “Airborne” 460, and “Soaring” 470, and the exercises increase in difficulty with each subsequent level. These levels may not isolate each of the language skills in different exercises, but instead the language skills section 490 combines the four language skills (phonology, semantics, syntax, and text) in exercises using content words, non-content words, and books. The content steadily increases in complexity so that with each succeeding level, the words become more intricate, the concepts more abstract, the sentences longer, and the books richer.
  • A set of skill checks 415, 425, 435, 445, 455, 465, and 475 assess the student's ability such that the student may bypass levels that teach content already known by the student. Similar to the literacy system 8 of FIG. 2, the student may bypass levels by successfully completing skill checks until a particular skill check suggests that the student completes a certain level. The literacy system 408 may be implemented such that the student progresses through the subsequent levels without returning to the skill checks. Alternatively, the literacy system 408 may be implemented such that the student returns to the skill checks on a regular basis to determine if any subsequent levels may be bypassed.
  • A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (20)

1. A method of practicing exercises in a literacy system, comprising:
viewing a first array of foreign symbols that are not associated with letters of a written language taught by the literacy system;
viewing a second array of foreign symbols, wherein the second array includes:
all of the foreign symbols of the first array in left-to-right sequence, and
additional foreign symbols intermingled with those from the first array;
identifying the same foreign symbols in the second array that appear in the first array in order of left-to-right sequence; and
receiving feedback regarding the proper or improper identification of the foreign symbols.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first array of foreign symbols is not viewable when viewing the second array of foreign symbols such that the first array of foreign symbols are to be memorized in order to identify those foreign symbols in the second array.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the foreign symbols are Greek symbols and the written language taught by the literacy system is English.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising viewing motor skills exercises for teaching handwriting letters of the written language taught by the literacy system, wherein the motor skills exercises introduce English alphabet letters in order of shape, size, and placement simplicity.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the motor skills exercises introduce the letters in a non-alphabetical order.
6. The literacy system of claim 5, wherein the motor skills exercises introduce single-shaped letters before double-shaped letters.
7. A computer-readable medium for a literacy system, the computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions that when executed perform the following functions:
displaying a first array of foreign symbols that are not associated with letters of a written language taught by the literacy system;
displaying a second array of foreign symbols, wherein the second array includes:
all of the foreign symbols of the first array in left-to-right sequence, and
additional foreign symbols intermingled with those from the first array;
receiving a user's input that identifies a selection of foreign symbols from the second array;
determining if the user's selection of foreign symbols from the second array match the foreign symbols that appear in the first array in order of left-to-right sequence; and
outputting an indicator to inform the user whether the user's selection of foreign symbols from the second array match the foreign symbols that appear in the first array in order of left-to-right sequence.
8. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, further comprising instructions stored thereon that when executed perform the following functions:
repeating the functions of claim 7 after determining the user's selection of foreign symbols from the second array does not match the foreign symbols that appear in the first array in order of left-to-right sequence.
9. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, wherein the first array of foreign symbols is not displayed when displaying the second array of foreign symbols.
10. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, wherein displaying the foreign symbols is performed using a computer display device.
11. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, wherein outputting the indicator is performed using an output selected from the group consisting of an audio speaker and a computer display device.
12. A method of presenting exercises of a literacy system, comprising:
displaying to a student at least a portion of a pre-reading section that includes sequencing exercises, the sequencing exercises including foreign symbols that are not associated with letters of a written language taught by the literacy system; and
displaying to the student at least a portion of a language skills section that includes language exercises to teach at least one language skill selected from a group consisting of phonology, semantics, syntax, and text.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising teaching the student the physical skill of visually scanning symbols in a left-to-right sequence using the sequencing exercises that include the foreign symbols.
14. The method of claim 12, further comprising teaching the student the physical skill of memorizing sequences of symbols using the sequencing exercises that include the foreign symbols.
15. The method of claim 14, further comprising concealing one or more of the foreign symbols of the sequencing exercises after displaying those one or more foreign symbols to the student.
16. The method of claim 12, wherein the foreign symbols are Greek symbols and the written language taught by the literacy system is English.
17. The method of claim 12, further comprising displaying to the student at least a portion of the pre-reading section that includes motor skills exercises to teach handwriting of letters of the written language.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising introducing the letters of the English alphabet in the motor skills exercises in order of shape, size, and placement simplicity.
19. The literacy system of claim 17, further comprising introducing the letters in the motor skills exercises in a non-alphabetical order.
20. The literacy system of claim 17, further comprising introducing single-shaped letters before double-shaped letters.
US11/581,879 2002-03-07 2006-10-17 Literacy system Abandoned US20070031796A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/581,879 US20070031796A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2006-10-17 Literacy system

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US36274902P 2002-03-07 2002-03-07
US10/350,849 US20030170596A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2003-01-24 Literacy system
US11/581,879 US20070031796A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2006-10-17 Literacy system

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/350,849 Division US20030170596A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2003-01-24 Literacy system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070031796A1 true US20070031796A1 (en) 2007-02-08

Family

ID=27791573

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/350,849 Abandoned US20030170596A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2003-01-24 Literacy system
US11/581,879 Abandoned US20070031796A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2006-10-17 Literacy system
US11/581,894 Expired - Fee Related US8016596B2 (en) 2002-03-07 2006-10-17 Literacy system
US13/230,672 Abandoned US20120082966A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2011-09-12 Literacy system

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/350,849 Abandoned US20030170596A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2003-01-24 Literacy system

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/581,894 Expired - Fee Related US8016596B2 (en) 2002-03-07 2006-10-17 Literacy system
US13/230,672 Abandoned US20120082966A1 (en) 2002-03-07 2011-09-12 Literacy system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US20030170596A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110306023A1 (en) * 2010-06-14 2011-12-15 Blank Marion S Online literacy system
US8342850B2 (en) 2002-03-07 2013-01-01 Blank Marion S Literacy education system for students with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD)

Families Citing this family (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8990214B2 (en) * 2001-06-27 2015-03-24 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Method and system for providing distributed editing and storage of digital media over a network
AU2002320579B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2006-08-24 Amplify Education, Inc. System and method for real-time observation assessment
US20060184494A1 (en) * 2003-09-17 2006-08-17 Torkel Klingberg Method and arrangement in a computer training system
US8568144B2 (en) * 2005-05-09 2013-10-29 Altis Avante Corp. Comprehension instruction system and method
US8764455B1 (en) 2005-05-09 2014-07-01 Altis Avante Corp. Comprehension instruction system and method
IL172157B (en) * 2005-11-24 2018-04-30 Meditouch Ltd Method and device for training motor skills
US20080160487A1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2008-07-03 Fairfield Language Technologies Modularized computer-aided language learning method and system
US8204851B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2012-06-19 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Method and system for providing a graphical workflow monitor
US8142198B2 (en) * 2008-05-23 2012-03-27 Melissa Klubnik Method for developing fine motor skills of the hand
US20100075282A1 (en) * 2008-07-28 2010-03-25 Yu Gregory J Omnidirectional word construction pedagogical tool and learning game
US20100248194A1 (en) * 2009-03-27 2010-09-30 Adithya Renduchintala Teaching system and method
US20100316359A1 (en) * 2009-06-11 2010-12-16 James Mally ENHANCING DVDs BY SHOWING LOOPING VIDEO CLIPS
US8510247B1 (en) 2009-06-30 2013-08-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Recommendation of media content items based on geolocation and venue
US10019995B1 (en) 2011-03-01 2018-07-10 Alice J. Stiebel Methods and systems for language learning based on a series of pitch patterns
US11062615B1 (en) 2011-03-01 2021-07-13 Intelligibility Training LLC Methods and systems for remote language learning in a pandemic-aware world
US8459999B2 (en) * 2011-03-08 2013-06-11 Mary Jean Washington Phonics education apparatus and method
JP5997261B2 (en) * 2011-05-10 2016-09-28 コーリ エーハウーエッフ A language learning system configured to customize language learning for individual users
US20120288833A1 (en) * 2011-05-13 2012-11-15 Ridgeway Karl F System and Method for Language Instruction Using Multiple Prompts
US8918718B2 (en) * 2012-02-27 2014-12-23 John Burgess Reading Performance System Reading performance system
US9628573B1 (en) 2012-05-01 2017-04-18 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Location-based interaction with digital works
US9430776B2 (en) 2012-10-25 2016-08-30 Google Inc. Customized E-books
US9009028B2 (en) 2012-12-14 2015-04-14 Google Inc. Custom dictionaries for E-books
US20150194064A1 (en) * 2014-01-09 2015-07-09 SkillFitness, LLC Audiovisual communication and learning management system
US20150287339A1 (en) * 2014-04-04 2015-10-08 Xerox Corporation Methods and systems for imparting training
US20150348434A1 (en) * 2014-06-02 2015-12-03 Cynthia H. Carcia Kelly Method for teaching high frequency word recognition
CN104966417B (en) * 2015-06-10 2017-11-24 王红梅 English Reading blank filling learning machine
CN104933904B (en) * 2015-06-10 2017-12-12 重庆市巴南区环美金属加工厂 English Reading blank filling learning machine
CN104966418B (en) * 2015-06-10 2018-06-01 哈尔滨学院 English Reading blank filling learning machine
CN105912684B (en) * 2016-04-15 2019-07-26 湘潭大学 The cross-media retrieval method of view-based access control model feature and semantic feature
US11587190B1 (en) 2016-08-12 2023-02-21 Ryan M. Frischmann System and method for the tracking and management of skills

Citations (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2193048A (en) * 1936-12-28 1940-03-12 Velde Elizabeth F Vander Educational device
US2361154A (en) * 1944-05-05 1944-10-24 Lucille D Schoolfield Educational device
US3363336A (en) * 1965-12-10 1968-01-16 Meredith Publishing Company Method and devices for teaching writing skills
US3774318A (en) * 1972-11-01 1973-11-27 G Sterriti Directionality trainer
US4437837A (en) * 1981-12-11 1984-03-20 Schnettler Shirley I Educational aid and method of using same
US4713008A (en) * 1986-09-09 1987-12-15 Stocker Elizabeth M Method and means for teaching a set of sound symbols through the unique device of phonetic phenomena
US5057020A (en) * 1986-04-15 1991-10-15 Cytanovich Kathryn F Reading enabler
US5405153A (en) * 1993-03-12 1995-04-11 Hauck; Lane T. Musical electronic game
US5429513A (en) * 1994-02-10 1995-07-04 Diaz-Plaza; Ruth R. Interactive teaching apparatus and method for teaching graphemes, grapheme names, phonemes, and phonetics
US5649826A (en) * 1996-03-19 1997-07-22 Sum Total, Inc. Method and device for teaching language
US5735693A (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-04-07 Multi Lingua Ltd.. Method and device for learning a foreign language
US5788503A (en) * 1996-02-27 1998-08-04 Alphagram Learning Materials Inc. Educational device for learning to read and pronounce
US5920838A (en) * 1997-06-02 1999-07-06 Carnegie Mellon University Reading and pronunciation tutor
US5951258A (en) * 1997-07-09 1999-09-14 Caterpillar Inc. Torque limiting control system for a hydraulic work machine
US5957693A (en) * 1997-08-04 1999-09-28 Treasure Bay Apparatus for shared reading
US6009397A (en) * 1994-07-22 1999-12-28 Siegel; Steven H. Phonic engine
US6022222A (en) * 1994-01-03 2000-02-08 Mary Beth Guinan Icon language teaching system
US6215901B1 (en) * 1997-03-07 2001-04-10 Mark H. Schwartz Pen based computer handwriting instruction
US6224384B1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2001-05-01 Scientific Learning Corp. Method and apparatus for training of auditory/visual discrimination using target and distractor phonemes/graphemes
US6227863B1 (en) * 1998-02-18 2001-05-08 Donald Spector Phonics training computer system for teaching spelling and reading
US6254395B1 (en) * 1998-04-13 2001-07-03 Educational Testing Service System and method for automated testing of writing skill
US6261101B1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2001-07-17 Scientific Learning Corp. Method and apparatus for cognitive training of humans using adaptive timing of exercises
US6299452B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-10-09 Cognitive Concepts, Inc. Diagnostic system and method for phonological awareness, phonological processing, and reading skill testing
US6302695B1 (en) * 1999-11-09 2001-10-16 Minds And Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for language training
US6305942B1 (en) * 1998-11-12 2001-10-23 Metalearning Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for increased language fluency through interactive comprehension, recognition and generation of sounds, words and sentences
US6358059B1 (en) * 1997-08-15 2002-03-19 Ruyun Li Method and apparatus for teaching rapid decoding (reading) and encoding (spelling)
US20020076675A1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-06-20 Scientific Learning Corporation Method and apparatus for automated training of language learning skills
US20020106617A1 (en) * 1996-03-27 2002-08-08 Techmicro, Inc. Application of multi-media technology to computer administered vocational personnel assessment
US6451163B2 (en) * 1998-05-29 2002-09-17 Andritz Inc. Method of handling comminuted cellulosic fibrous slurry in a cylindrical vessel
US6468084B1 (en) * 1999-08-13 2002-10-22 Beacon Literacy, Llc System and method for literacy development
US6491524B2 (en) * 2001-04-04 2002-12-10 Patricia Bender Reading device and methods of using same to teach and learn reading
US6511324B1 (en) * 1998-10-07 2003-01-28 Cognitive Concepts, Inc. Phonological awareness, phonological processing, and reading skill training system and method
US6544039B2 (en) * 2000-12-01 2003-04-08 Autoskill International Inc. Method of teaching reading
US6601850B1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2003-08-05 Brad Ross Progressing pattern memory game and its associated method of play
US6604947B1 (en) * 1998-10-06 2003-08-12 Shogen Rai Alphabet image reading method
US6632174B1 (en) * 2000-07-06 2003-10-14 Cognifit Ltd (Naiot) Method and apparatus for testing and training cognitive ability
US6729882B2 (en) * 2001-08-09 2004-05-04 Thomas F. Noble Phonetic instructional database computer device for teaching the sound patterns of English
US6736641B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2004-05-18 Thomas Elkin Quiroz Teaching method and learning aid(s) to speak any foreign language
US6740802B1 (en) * 2000-09-06 2004-05-25 Bernard H. Browne, Jr. Instant musician, recording artist and composer
US6755657B1 (en) * 1999-11-09 2004-06-29 Cognitive Concepts, Inc. Reading and spelling skill diagnosis and training system and method
US6796798B1 (en) * 2002-03-27 2004-09-28 University Of South Florida Dynamic reading instruction
US6954199B2 (en) * 2001-06-18 2005-10-11 Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. Three dimensional interactive system
US7249950B2 (en) * 2003-10-10 2007-07-31 Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. Display apparatus for teaching writing

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5451163A (en) * 1990-12-18 1995-09-19 Joseph R. Black Method of teaching reading including displaying one or more visible symbols in a transparent medium between student and teacher
US5893717A (en) 1994-02-01 1999-04-13 Educational Testing Service Computerized method and system for teaching prose, document and quantitative literacy

Patent Citations (45)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2193048A (en) * 1936-12-28 1940-03-12 Velde Elizabeth F Vander Educational device
US2361154A (en) * 1944-05-05 1944-10-24 Lucille D Schoolfield Educational device
US3363336A (en) * 1965-12-10 1968-01-16 Meredith Publishing Company Method and devices for teaching writing skills
US3774318A (en) * 1972-11-01 1973-11-27 G Sterriti Directionality trainer
US4437837A (en) * 1981-12-11 1984-03-20 Schnettler Shirley I Educational aid and method of using same
US5057020A (en) * 1986-04-15 1991-10-15 Cytanovich Kathryn F Reading enabler
US4713008A (en) * 1986-09-09 1987-12-15 Stocker Elizabeth M Method and means for teaching a set of sound symbols through the unique device of phonetic phenomena
US5405153A (en) * 1993-03-12 1995-04-11 Hauck; Lane T. Musical electronic game
US6022222A (en) * 1994-01-03 2000-02-08 Mary Beth Guinan Icon language teaching system
US5429513A (en) * 1994-02-10 1995-07-04 Diaz-Plaza; Ruth R. Interactive teaching apparatus and method for teaching graphemes, grapheme names, phonemes, and phonetics
US6009397A (en) * 1994-07-22 1999-12-28 Siegel; Steven H. Phonic engine
US5788503A (en) * 1996-02-27 1998-08-04 Alphagram Learning Materials Inc. Educational device for learning to read and pronounce
US5649826A (en) * 1996-03-19 1997-07-22 Sum Total, Inc. Method and device for teaching language
US20020106617A1 (en) * 1996-03-27 2002-08-08 Techmicro, Inc. Application of multi-media technology to computer administered vocational personnel assessment
US5735693A (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-04-07 Multi Lingua Ltd.. Method and device for learning a foreign language
US6215901B1 (en) * 1997-03-07 2001-04-10 Mark H. Schwartz Pen based computer handwriting instruction
US5920838A (en) * 1997-06-02 1999-07-06 Carnegie Mellon University Reading and pronunciation tutor
US5951258A (en) * 1997-07-09 1999-09-14 Caterpillar Inc. Torque limiting control system for a hydraulic work machine
US5957693A (en) * 1997-08-04 1999-09-28 Treasure Bay Apparatus for shared reading
US6358059B1 (en) * 1997-08-15 2002-03-19 Ruyun Li Method and apparatus for teaching rapid decoding (reading) and encoding (spelling)
US6224384B1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2001-05-01 Scientific Learning Corp. Method and apparatus for training of auditory/visual discrimination using target and distractor phonemes/graphemes
US6261101B1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2001-07-17 Scientific Learning Corp. Method and apparatus for cognitive training of humans using adaptive timing of exercises
US6334776B1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2002-01-01 Scientific Learning Corporation Method and apparatus for training of auditory/visual discrimination using target and distractor phonemes/graphemes
US6227863B1 (en) * 1998-02-18 2001-05-08 Donald Spector Phonics training computer system for teaching spelling and reading
US6254395B1 (en) * 1998-04-13 2001-07-03 Educational Testing Service System and method for automated testing of writing skill
US6451163B2 (en) * 1998-05-29 2002-09-17 Andritz Inc. Method of handling comminuted cellulosic fibrous slurry in a cylindrical vessel
US6604947B1 (en) * 1998-10-06 2003-08-12 Shogen Rai Alphabet image reading method
US6511324B1 (en) * 1998-10-07 2003-01-28 Cognitive Concepts, Inc. Phonological awareness, phonological processing, and reading skill training system and method
US6305942B1 (en) * 1998-11-12 2001-10-23 Metalearning Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for increased language fluency through interactive comprehension, recognition and generation of sounds, words and sentences
US6299452B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-10-09 Cognitive Concepts, Inc. Diagnostic system and method for phonological awareness, phonological processing, and reading skill testing
US20020164563A1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2002-11-07 Janet Wasowicz Diagnostic system and method for phonological awareness, phonological processing, and reading skill testing
US6468084B1 (en) * 1999-08-13 2002-10-22 Beacon Literacy, Llc System and method for literacy development
US6755657B1 (en) * 1999-11-09 2004-06-29 Cognitive Concepts, Inc. Reading and spelling skill diagnosis and training system and method
US6302695B1 (en) * 1999-11-09 2001-10-16 Minds And Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for language training
US6632174B1 (en) * 2000-07-06 2003-10-14 Cognifit Ltd (Naiot) Method and apparatus for testing and training cognitive ability
US6740802B1 (en) * 2000-09-06 2004-05-25 Bernard H. Browne, Jr. Instant musician, recording artist and composer
US20020076675A1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-06-20 Scientific Learning Corporation Method and apparatus for automated training of language learning skills
US6544039B2 (en) * 2000-12-01 2003-04-08 Autoskill International Inc. Method of teaching reading
US6491524B2 (en) * 2001-04-04 2002-12-10 Patricia Bender Reading device and methods of using same to teach and learn reading
US6954199B2 (en) * 2001-06-18 2005-10-11 Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. Three dimensional interactive system
US6729882B2 (en) * 2001-08-09 2004-05-04 Thomas F. Noble Phonetic instructional database computer device for teaching the sound patterns of English
US6601850B1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2003-08-05 Brad Ross Progressing pattern memory game and its associated method of play
US6736641B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2004-05-18 Thomas Elkin Quiroz Teaching method and learning aid(s) to speak any foreign language
US6796798B1 (en) * 2002-03-27 2004-09-28 University Of South Florida Dynamic reading instruction
US7249950B2 (en) * 2003-10-10 2007-07-31 Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. Display apparatus for teaching writing

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8342850B2 (en) 2002-03-07 2013-01-01 Blank Marion S Literacy education system for students with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD)
US9245456B2 (en) 2002-03-07 2016-01-26 Jonathan Blank Literacy education system
US20110306023A1 (en) * 2010-06-14 2011-12-15 Blank Marion S Online literacy system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20120082966A1 (en) 2012-04-05
US20070048696A1 (en) 2007-03-01
US8016596B2 (en) 2011-09-13
US20030170596A1 (en) 2003-09-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070031796A1 (en) Literacy system
US8342850B2 (en) Literacy education system for students with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD)
US20080206724A1 (en) Vowel based method of teaching the reading of English
Nicolson et al. Evaluation of a computer‐based reading intervention in infant and junior schools
US20110306023A1 (en) Online literacy system
Jolliffe et al. Teaching systematic synthetic phonics in primary schools
Burns How to teach balanced reading and writing
Honig Teaching our children to read: The components of an effective, comprehensive reading program
Beatty Language, task and situation: Authenticity in the classroom
Mason et al. Learning to read in Japan
Cooke Tackling dyslexia
Bott Computer-aided self-access pronunciation materials designed to teach stress in American English
RU2717739C2 (en) Method of teaching reading and quick reading using computer game in online simulator
US20040005533A1 (en) Teaching method and kit for the dictionary
Makszim Effective Methods to Form and Improve Learners’ Spelling Skills
Fernandez READERS intervention program for readers-at-risk
Nudelman The Teaching of Hebrew—Another Look Ten Years Later
Cuccia The Effects of Supplemental Phonemic Awareness and Phonics Instruction on Kindergarten Students’ Writing Performance
Shukor et al. Let's Simmatch: An Interactive and Fun Method in Learning Arabic (Hija'yyah) Letters: Jom SIMMATCH: Kaedah Menarik dan Interaktif untuk Pembelajaran Huruf Hijaiyah Bahasa Arab
Stoltz Promoting reading development of beginner readers in the Umlazi District of KwaZulu-Natal
Samonte et al. Computer-aided Japanese language learning for N4 and N5 level
Waszczuk Alternatywne metody nauki czytania dzieci w wieku przedszkolnym
RU2404455C1 (en) Method of teaching children first principles of reading and writing and device for its realisation
Batt ESL Curriculum Guide: Materials and Methods for Teaching English as a Second Language to Adults.
LaRue Teaching pre-literate adults to read and write Englsih as a second language

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION