Abstract
Capital flows have become an integral part of the Indian economy. The last two decades have witnessed an increasing volume of capital inflows. It is in this background that this paper delves into the more fundamental aspect which needs to be understood before evaluating the impact of capital inflows and efficacy of alternative policy instruments. To be specific, the paper makes an attempt to explore several characteristics of capital inflows to India. Here, we have focused on the six alternative dimensions of capital inflow, namely, composition of capital flow, behaviors of net and gross flows, volatility, substitutability across flows, persistence, and cyclical behavior. We find that foreign investment is the key component of capital inflows, followed by loan and banking capital inflow. On the disaggregated level, capital inflows to India are dominated by FPI, banking capital, FDI, and commercial borrowing. Moreover, short-term credit inflow has accelerated in recent times. Gross flows behave differently from net flows. By focusing on total capital inflow, it is found that gross flows are voluminous, more volatile, and more persistent than net inflow. FPI and banking capital are found to be the most volatile components, followed by FDI and commercial borrowing. There are complementarities across the net flows of different types and also between the gross inflow and outflow. Net total capital inflows to India have become more persistent during the last decade. However, the degree of persistence largely differs across the types of flow. FDI and short-term credit are found to be the most persistent components. Banking capital seems to be the “most volatile and least persistent” in nature, followed by FPI. FPI and short-term credit inflows are procyclical in nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Here, we do not differentiate between domestic and foreign investors.
For example, net inflow can be controlled either by controlling gross inflow or by liberalizing gross outflow or by a combination of both.
F test confirms that there is no significant difference between the volatility of FPI and banking capital in one hand, and volatility of FDI and commercial borrowing, on the other hand.
T test shows that there is no significant difference between the mean values of FPI and FDI on one hand, and commercial borrowing and banking capital on the other.
As an alternative measure of business cycles, we also used a measure of the output gap based on the Hodrick–Prescott filter. The results obtained were qualitatively similar to the ones reported here.
References
Ahmed S, Zlate A (2013) Capital flows to emerging market economies: a brave new world? International finance discussion papers, no. 1081
Aizenman J, Pasricha GK (2013) Why do emerging markets liberalize capital outflow controls? Fiscal versus net capital flow concerns. J Int Money Financ 39:28–64
Alper CE, İsmail S (2001) The transmission of a sudden capital outflow. East Eur Econ 39(2):29–48
Bosworth BP, Collins SM, Reinhart CM (1999) Capital flows to developing economies: implications for saving and investment. Brook Pap Econ Act 1999:143–180
Broner F, Didier T, Erce A, Schmukler SL (2013) Gross capital flows: dynamics and crises. J Monet Econ 60(1):113–133
Calvo GA, Leiderman L, Reinhart CM (1996) Inflows of capital to developing countries in the 1990s. J Econ Perspect 10(2):123–139
Cardarelli R, Elekdag S, Kose MA (2010) Capital inflows: macroeconomic implications and policy responses. Econ Syst 34(4):333–356
Chakraborty I (2006) Capital inflows during the post-liberalisation period. Econ Polit Wkly 41(2):143–150
Claessens S, Dooley MP, Warner A (1995) Portfolio capital flows: hot or cold? World Bank Econ Rev 9(1):153–174
Coondoo D, Mukherjee P (2004) Volatility of FII in India. Money Financ 2:15–16
Fernandez-Arias E (1996) The new wave of private capital inflows: push or pull? J Dev Econ 48(2):389–418
Fernandez-Arias E, Montiel PJ (1996) The surge in capital inflows to developing countries: an analytical overview. World Bank Econ Rev 10(1):51–77
Forbes KJ, Warnock FE (2012) Capital flow waves: surges, stops, flight, and retrenchment. J Int Econ 88(2):235–251
Kim Y (2000) Causes of capital flows in developing countries. J Int Money Financ 19(2):235–253
Kohli R (2001) Capital flows and their macroeconomic effects in India. International monetary fund
Kohli R (2003) Capital flows and domestic financial sector in India. Econ Polit Wkly 38(8):761–768
Kohli R (2010) Managing capital flows: policy options for India. Econ Polit Wkly 45(46):40–44
Mazumdar T (2005) Capital flows into India: implications for its economic growth. Econ Polit Wkly 40(21):2183–2189
Montiel P, Reinhart CM (1999) Do capital controls and macroeconomic policies influence the volume and composition of capital flows? Evidence from the 1990s. J int money financ 18(4):619–635
Osei R, Morrissey O, Lensink R (2002) The volatility of capital inflows: measures and trends for developing countries. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
Pami Dua, Sen Partha (2013) Capital flows and exchange rates: the Indian experience. Indian Econ Rev 48(1):189–220
Patnaik I, Shah A (2012) Did the Indian capital controls work as a tool of macroeconomic policy and quest. IMF Econ Rev 60(3):439–464
Steiner A (2013) The accumulation of foreign exchange by central banks: fear of capital mobility? J Macroecon 38:409–427
Taylor MP, Sarno L (1997) Capital flows to developing countries: long-and short-term determinants. World Bank Econ Rev 11(3):451–470
Yentürk Nurhan (1999) Short-term capital inflows and their impact on macroeconomic structure: Turkey in the 1990s. Dev Econ 37(1):89–113
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Majumder, S.B., Nag, R.N. Capital flow in India: facts, features, and analysis. Decision 42, 19–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-014-0064-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-014-0064-y