The Bhopal Disaster, also known as the Bhopal gas tragedy, was an industrial incident that shook the world to its core. On December 2–3, 1984, a leak of toxic gases from the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, claimed the lives of thousands of people and caused serious health problems for many more. It was a tragedy that could have been avoided, had it not been for a series of failures and oversights on the part of the companies involved.
As the clouds of gas descended upon the unsuspecting town, people panicked and fled for their lives. The streets were filled with the sound of screams and the sight of bodies writhing in agony. It was a scene of utter chaos, a moment that would be etched in the memories of those who witnessed it forever. The scene of utter chaos reads like an event from an Ancient Greek tragedy story.
But what caused this disaster? How could something like this happen? As it turns out, the Bhopal gas tragedy was the result of a series of ethical failures on the part of UCIL and the other companies involved.
One of the key ethical issues surrounding the disaster was the question of risk assessment. UCIL took on a significant level of risk in operating the facility, but it seems that the company did not fully assess the potential consequences of this risk, and did not take sufficient precautions, such as a contingency plan, to reduce the chances of an accident from happening. For example, lifeboats and lifejackets are part of a ship to reduce the harm from the event of sinking or drowning. So, where were the “lifeboats” and “lifejackets” for this pesticide plant in the event of leaks? This lack of risk assessment demonstrates a lack of concern for the safety of the local community and the environment, as well as a lack of transparency and honesty in communicating the potential risks of the plant.
Another ethical issue that arose was the lack of corporate social responsibility on the part of UCIL and the other companies involved in the disaster. The pursuit of profit should not come at the expense of safety and the well-being of others, and it is clear that the companies involved in the Bhopal gas tragedy did not act with a concern for the well-being of the local community or the environment. In fact, it seems that they were primarily motivated by profit, and did not consider the potential consequences of their actions.
The review process after the disaster was also deficient. The UCIL leadership did not talk about the lessons they learned from the incident, nor did they outline any steps they would take to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future. Again, there was no mention of contingency planning to reduce or prevent future reoccurrences of something similar.
As the years went by and the dust settled, the people of Bhopal were left to pick up the pieces of their shattered lives. The memory of that fateful night still haunts them, a constant reminder of the devastation that can be caused by irresponsible corporate practices. But perhaps, in the aftermath of this tragedy, we can learn from our mistakes and work towards a better, safer future for all.
—
This post was previously published on medium.com.
***
You may also like these posts on The Good Men Project:
White Fragility: Talking to White People About Racism | Escape the “Act Like a Man” Box | The Lack of Gentle Platonic Touch in Men’s Lives is a Killer | What We Talk About When We Talk About Men |
—
Photo credit: iStockPhoto.com