US20090135050A1 - Automotive radar system - Google Patents

Automotive radar system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090135050A1
US20090135050A1 US11/944,824 US94482407A US2009135050A1 US 20090135050 A1 US20090135050 A1 US 20090135050A1 US 94482407 A US94482407 A US 94482407A US 2009135050 A1 US2009135050 A1 US 2009135050A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
radar
animate
echoes
signal
objects
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/944,824
Other versions
US7532152B1 (en
Inventor
Serdar H. Yonak
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyota Motor Corp
Original Assignee
Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc filed Critical Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc
Priority to US11/944,824 priority Critical patent/US7532152B1/en
Assigned to TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC. reassignment TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: YONAK, SERDAR H.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7532152B1 publication Critical patent/US7532152B1/en
Publication of US20090135050A1 publication Critical patent/US20090135050A1/en
Assigned to TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION reassignment TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/93Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/41Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00 using analysis of echo signal for target characterisation; Target signature; Target cross-section
    • G01S7/411Identification of targets based on measurements of radar reflectivity

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to automotive radar systems and, more particularly, to such a system which identifies animate objects within a range of interest.
  • automotive radar systems typically comprise a high frequency radar transmitter which transmits a radar signal in a known direction.
  • the transmitter may transmit the radar signal in either a continuous or pulse mode.
  • These systems also include a receiver connected to the appropriate antenna system which receives echoes or reflections from the transmitted radar signal. Each such reflection or echo represents an object struck by the transmitted radar signal.
  • the use of automotive radar has been generally limited to collision avoidance systems.
  • the system detects the distance between the vehicle immediately forward of the vehicle having radar. Whenever the distance between the two vehicles falls less than a predetermined amount, which may vary as a function of speed, the radar system either generates an alert to the driver or automatically slows the vehicle down to increase the spacing between the vehicle and the next forward vehicle.
  • Still other automotive radar systems detect the distance of objects within the direction of travel of the automotive vehicle and take necessary steps to avoid collision with those objects.
  • the present invention provides an automotive radar system which overcomes the previously known disadvantages of the prior systems.
  • the automotive radar system of the present invention comprises a high frequency radio transmitter which generates a radio signal in a known direction relative to the vehicle.
  • the radio transmitter may generate the radar signal in either a pulse mode or continuous mode.
  • the radar system further includes a radar receiver having two or more antennas that receive reflections or echoes of the radar signal resulting from impingement with an object. The position and distance for each such identified object is then provided as input data to a processor.
  • the processor by analyzing the received data for each object over a period of time, then discriminates between animate objects and inanimate objects.
  • the identification of animate objects may be achieved in several different ways.
  • the reflected radar signal may be compared to a matched set filter contained as data in the processor for the radar system.
  • the filters may contain both animate as well as inanimate objects so that, once a match has been made, the identification of the object as an animate or inanimate object may be rapidly determined.
  • the processor provides an alert signal to the operator of the vehicle.
  • the vehicle includes a video display screen and the alert signal comprises displaying video objects on the screen which correspond to the animate objects identified by the radar system.
  • Other alert signals such as an audible signal, may also be employed.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagrammatic view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is an elevational diagrammatic view illustrating the operation of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the receipt of exemplary radar echoes corresponding to objects within the range of interest
  • FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIG. 3 but illustrating the received signal over an extended time period
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the radar system 10 includes a high frequency radio transmitter 12 which generates a radar signal through a radar antenna 14 in a known direction, typically forwardly, relative to a vehicle 26 ( FIG. 2 ).
  • governmental regulations allow automotive radar in the range of 76-81 GHz, although other frequency ranges may become available or mandated for use in automotive systems in the future.
  • the radar system 10 further includes a radar receiver 16 having at least two antennas 18 that are physically spaced apart on the automotive vehicle 26 . Such spaced apart antennas 18 allow the radar system to identify the position of any received signals by the antenna 18 through triangulation, phase shifting processing or other means.
  • the radar receiver 16 provides an output to a processor 20 indicative of the echo(es) or radar signal reflection received by the receiver 16 .
  • the information provided to the processor 20 enables the processor to determine both the position and distance between any objects detected by the radar receiver 16 .
  • the processor 20 which is preferably microprocessor based, analyzes the data received from the radar receiver 16 to identify and discriminate between animate objects and inanimate objects that are within a range of interest.
  • the algorithm utilized by the processor 20 to identify animate objects will be subsequently described in greater detail.
  • the processor 20 After the processor 20 identifies animate objects within a range of interest, the processor 20 , through an alert control circuit 22 , generates an alert 24 to the operator of the vehicle 26 .
  • This alert 24 may comprise, for example, a video display of the animate objects on a video display screen accessible to the operator of the vehicle or other audible or visual alerts.
  • the alert 24 may also include automatic control of the vehicle 26 , e.g. automatic braking of the vehicle 26 .
  • the automotive radar system 10 is there shown installed in the vehicle 26 which is either stationary or traveling in the direction of arrow 28 . It is only desirable to identify animate objects, such as a person 30 or a deer 32 , which may move into the path of travel of the vehicle 26 . Consequently, it is only necessary to examine the objects, both animate and inanimate, that are within a certain range of interest 34 .
  • the range of interest 34 may, for example, include both an angular range ⁇ as well as a distance range d, either of which may vary as a function of the speed of the vehicle 26 .
  • the radar transmitter generates the high frequency radio signal through the antenna 14 as illustrated at 36 ( FIG. 2 ) in the well known manner. Furthermore, the transmission of the high frequency radio signal through the antenna 14 may be either in pulse mode or continuous mode.
  • each of the objects 30 , 32 , 33 and 35 Whenever the radar signal 36 impinges upon an object within the range of interest 34 , that object reflects the radar signal 36 back to the receiving antennas 18 on the motor vehicle 26 .
  • This reflected signal or echo from both the inanimate objects 33 and 35 , as well as the animate objects 30 and 32 enables each of the objects 30 , 32 , 33 and 35 to not only be located but also, ultimately, to be identified as either an animate or an inanimate object.
  • the time lapse between the transmission of the radar signal by the antenna 14 and the receipt of the echo from each object determines the distance between the object and the vehicle 26 .
  • the phase shift between the receiving antennas 18 of each echo enables the angular position of the object relative to the vehicle 26 to be determined. Since both the angular position as well as the distance is determinable within the range of interest 34 , the position of each object 30 , 32 , 33 and 35 may be calculated by the processor 20 .
  • the amplitude of the echo will vary depending upon the type of object within the area of interest 34 .
  • An exemplary received radio signal for the scenario illustrated in FIG. 2 is shown in FIG. 3 with the amplitude of the echo charted as a function of time t long .
  • a first echo indicated at elapsed time t l i.e. the elapsed time between the transmission of the radar signal and the receipt of the echo, corresponds to the nearest object or the person 30 as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • a second echo 52 corresponds to the next further object or the deer 32 while a third echo 54 corresponds to the stop sign 33 .
  • An echo 56 corresponds to the vehicle 35 immediately in front of the vehicle 26 .
  • the amplitude of the radar echo from the automotive vehicle 35 is much greater than the amplitude of the echoes from either the person 30 , deer 32 or stop sign 33 since the automotive vehicle 35 is not only largely metallic in construction, but also much larger than the other objects.
  • FIG. 4 a graph of the received echoes by the antenna is shown over an extended period of time t long .
  • FIG. 4 also depicts the received radar echoes with the vehicle 26 stationary; otherwise the echoes 50 , 52 , 54 and 56 would shift along the elapsed time axis as the distance between the objects 30 , 32 , 33 and 35 changes. Consequently, the echo or reflection signal 50 from the person 30 will include different amplitude modulations 60 at spaced time intervals. This amplitude modulation may result from respiration of the person, the person's heartbeat, and/or the like.
  • the echo signal 52 from the deer 32 would also contain amplitude modulations 62 at spaced time intervals. These amplitude modulations 62 , however, presumably would be different than the amplitude modulation exhibited by the person 30 .
  • the received radar echo 54 from the stop sign 33 would not exhibit this type of amplitude modulation since both are inanimate objects.
  • the echo signal 56 from the vehicle 35 is greater than a threshold Amp thresh ( FIG. 3 ) which represents an echo signal larger than any expected animate object.
  • the radar transmitter 12 generates a microwave radar signal, preferably in the range of 76-81 GHz, through the antenna 14 and in a known direction relative to the vehicle.
  • that known direction corresponds to the area of interest 34 forwardly of the vehicle 26 and in the angular range ⁇ as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • Step 100 then proceeds to step 102 .
  • the radar receiver 16 receives the echoes from objects within the area of interest 34 through its antennas 18 .
  • Each received echo will vary both in amplitude, depending upon the object producing the echo, as well as the elapsed time between the transmission of the radar signal at step 100 and the receipt of its echo.
  • Objects that are closer to the vehicle 26 will exhibit a shorter elapsed time between the transmission of the radar signal and the reception of its echo while, conversely, objects further from the vehicle 26 will exhibit a longer elapsed time between the transmission of the radar signal and the reception of its echo.
  • Step 102 then proceeds to step 104 .
  • step 104 eliminates the received radar echoes having an amplitude in excess of Amp thresh . Such reflections or echoes with large amplitudes would correspond to other automotive vehicles and thus inanimate objects. Step 104 then proceeds to step 106 .
  • step 106 determines if there are any other objects that are identified within the range of interest. Consequently, for the example illustrated, the echo 56 corresponding to the vehicle 35 is eliminated from further processing at step 104 so that step 106 determines that there are three separate remaining objects, each corresponding to echoes 50 , 52 and 54 , and step 106 proceeds to step 108 . However, if no objects are found within the range of interest at step 106 , step 106 branches back to step 100 where the above process is repeated.
  • the processor 20 determines whether the objects 30 , 32 and 33 which respectively produce the return echoes 50 , 52 and 54 are animate or inanimate.
  • the identification of animate objects within the range of interest 34 may be accomplished in different ways.
  • a plurality of echoes may be received over a relatively long period of time t long as illustrated in FIG. 4 .
  • Each echo 50 , 52 or 54 is examined to determine if it exhibits amplitude modulation over that relatively long period of time.
  • Such amplitude modulation can result from a heartbeat, respiration, actual movement of the inanimate object, and the like.
  • the processor 20 identifies the object as an animate object.
  • the received echoes from the radar transmission may be compared to match set filters that are previously determined and stored in memory accessible to the processor 20 .
  • filters may correspond to objects commonly found along highways, such as stop signs, speed limit signs, and the like.
  • the appropriate filter is applied to the received echo 50 , 52 and 54 , the object is accordingly identified as either animate or inanimate as the case may be.
  • step 108 branches to step 110 where the algorithm determines whether or not all objects within the range of interest 34 have been processed. If not, step 110 branches back to step 108 where the above process is repeated.
  • step 108 instead branches to step 112 where the processor 20 generates an alert signal 24 via the alert control circuit 22 .
  • This alert signal 24 may comprise, for example, the display of a symbol on a video display screen, or other alert signals.
  • the alert signal 24 can change the operation of the vehicle itself. For example, in the event of a possible collision with an animate object, the alert signal 24 may automatically apply the vehicle brakes to slow the vehicle or even steer the vehicle around the animate object.
  • the present invention provides an automotive radar system which identifies animate objects within a range of interest and which may potentially enter into the path of travel of the vehicle.

Abstract

An automotive radar system having a high frequency radio transmitter which generates a radar signal in a known direction. A high frequency radio receiver receives echoes from the radar signal in which each echo represents a reflection of the radar signal from an object. A processor then identifies animate objects, if any, from the received echoes within a range of interest and generates an alert signal for each such identified animate object.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • I. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates generally to automotive radar systems and, more particularly, to such a system which identifies animate objects within a range of interest.
  • II. Description of Material Art
  • There are previously known automotive radar systems and such automotive radar systems are expected to become more prevalent in the future. These automotive radar systems typically comprise a high frequency radar transmitter which transmits a radar signal in a known direction. The transmitter may transmit the radar signal in either a continuous or pulse mode.
  • These systems also include a receiver connected to the appropriate antenna system which receives echoes or reflections from the transmitted radar signal. Each such reflection or echo represents an object struck by the transmitted radar signal.
  • To date, the use of automotive radar has been generally limited to collision avoidance systems. For example, in some radar systems, the system detects the distance between the vehicle immediately forward of the vehicle having radar. Whenever the distance between the two vehicles falls less than a predetermined amount, which may vary as a function of speed, the radar system either generates an alert to the driver or automatically slows the vehicle down to increase the spacing between the vehicle and the next forward vehicle.
  • Still other automotive radar systems detect the distance of objects within the direction of travel of the automotive vehicle and take necessary steps to avoid collision with those objects.
  • There are situations, however, where an object is outside the direction of travel of the vehicle but may move into the direction of travel of the vehicle and cause a collision. For example, animals, such as deer, as well as people may move suddenly into the path of travel of the vehicle and cause a collision. These previously known radar systems have been unable to discriminate between animate objects which may move into the path of travel of the vehicle and inanimate objects.
  • SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • The present invention provides an automotive radar system which overcomes the previously known disadvantages of the prior systems.
  • In brief, the automotive radar system of the present invention comprises a high frequency radio transmitter which generates a radio signal in a known direction relative to the vehicle. The radio transmitter may generate the radar signal in either a pulse mode or continuous mode.
  • The radar system further includes a radar receiver having two or more antennas that receive reflections or echoes of the radar signal resulting from impingement with an object. The position and distance for each such identified object is then provided as input data to a processor.
  • The processor, by analyzing the received data for each object over a period of time, then discriminates between animate objects and inanimate objects. The identification of animate objects may be achieved in several different ways.
  • First, all animate objects of interest, such as people and other mammals, continually exhibit certain movements. For example, such animate objects have a continuous heartbeat, respiration and the like, all of which results in amplitude modulation of the reflected signal back to the automotive vehicle. Consequently, identification of amplitude modulation in the reflected signal over a period of time is indicative that the object is animate.
  • Similarly, the reflected radar signal may be compared to a matched set filter contained as data in the processor for the radar system. The filters may contain both animate as well as inanimate objects so that, once a match has been made, the identification of the object as an animate or inanimate object may be rapidly determined.
  • Once the animate objects have been identified, the processor provides an alert signal to the operator of the vehicle. In one embodiment of the invention, the vehicle includes a video display screen and the alert signal comprises displaying video objects on the screen which correspond to the animate objects identified by the radar system. Other alert signals, such as an audible signal, may also be employed.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
  • A better understanding of the present invention will be had upon reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, wherein like reference characters refer to like parts throughout the several views, and in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagrammatic view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is an elevational diagrammatic view illustrating the operation of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the receipt of exemplary radar echoes corresponding to objects within the range of interest;
  • FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIG. 3 but illustrating the received signal over an extended time period; and
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • With reference first to FIG. 1, a block diagrammatic view of a preferred embodiment of the radar system 10 according to the present invention is shown. The radar system 10 includes a high frequency radio transmitter 12 which generates a radar signal through a radar antenna 14 in a known direction, typically forwardly, relative to a vehicle 26 (FIG. 2). At present, governmental regulations allow automotive radar in the range of 76-81 GHz, although other frequency ranges may become available or mandated for use in automotive systems in the future.
  • The radar system 10 further includes a radar receiver 16 having at least two antennas 18 that are physically spaced apart on the automotive vehicle 26. Such spaced apart antennas 18 allow the radar system to identify the position of any received signals by the antenna 18 through triangulation, phase shifting processing or other means.
  • The radar receiver 16 provides an output to a processor 20 indicative of the echo(es) or radar signal reflection received by the receiver 16. The information provided to the processor 20 enables the processor to determine both the position and distance between any objects detected by the radar receiver 16.
  • The processor 20, which is preferably microprocessor based, analyzes the data received from the radar receiver 16 to identify and discriminate between animate objects and inanimate objects that are within a range of interest. The algorithm utilized by the processor 20 to identify animate objects will be subsequently described in greater detail.
  • After the processor 20 identifies animate objects within a range of interest, the processor 20, through an alert control circuit 22, generates an alert 24 to the operator of the vehicle 26. This alert 24 may comprise, for example, a video display of the animate objects on a video display screen accessible to the operator of the vehicle or other audible or visual alerts. The alert 24 may also include automatic control of the vehicle 26, e.g. automatic braking of the vehicle 26.
  • With reference now to FIG. 2, the automotive radar system 10 is there shown installed in the vehicle 26 which is either stationary or traveling in the direction of arrow 28. It is only desirable to identify animate objects, such as a person 30 or a deer 32, which may move into the path of travel of the vehicle 26. Consequently, it is only necessary to examine the objects, both animate and inanimate, that are within a certain range of interest 34. The range of interest 34 may, for example, include both an angular range α as well as a distance range d, either of which may vary as a function of the speed of the vehicle 26.
  • With reference now to FIGS. 2 and 3, the radar transmitter generates the high frequency radio signal through the antenna 14 as illustrated at 36 (FIG. 2) in the well known manner. Furthermore, the transmission of the high frequency radio signal through the antenna 14 may be either in pulse mode or continuous mode.
  • Whenever the radar signal 36 impinges upon an object within the range of interest 34, that object reflects the radar signal 36 back to the receiving antennas 18 on the motor vehicle 26. This reflected signal or echo from both the inanimate objects 33 and 35, as well as the animate objects 30 and 32, enables each of the objects 30, 32, 33 and 35 to not only be located but also, ultimately, to be identified as either an animate or an inanimate object.
  • First, the time lapse between the transmission of the radar signal by the antenna 14 and the receipt of the echo from each object determines the distance between the object and the vehicle 26. The phase shift between the receiving antennas 18 of each echo enables the angular position of the object relative to the vehicle 26 to be determined. Since both the angular position as well as the distance is determinable within the range of interest 34, the position of each object 30, 32, 33 and 35 may be calculated by the processor 20.
  • The amplitude of the echo will vary depending upon the type of object within the area of interest 34. An exemplary received radio signal for the scenario illustrated in FIG. 2 is shown in FIG. 3 with the amplitude of the echo charted as a function of time tlong.
  • With reference then to FIGS. 2 and 3, a first echo indicated at elapsed time tl, i.e. the elapsed time between the transmission of the radar signal and the receipt of the echo, corresponds to the nearest object or the person 30 as shown in FIG. 2. Similarly, a second echo 52 corresponds to the next further object or the deer 32 while a third echo 54 corresponds to the stop sign 33. An echo 56 corresponds to the vehicle 35 immediately in front of the vehicle 26. Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 3, the amplitude of the radar echo from the automotive vehicle 35 is much greater than the amplitude of the echoes from either the person 30, deer 32 or stop sign 33 since the automotive vehicle 35 is not only largely metallic in construction, but also much larger than the other objects.
  • With reference now to FIG. 4, a graph of the received echoes by the antenna is shown over an extended period of time tlong. For simplicity, FIG. 4 also depicts the received radar echoes with the vehicle 26 stationary; otherwise the echoes 50, 52, 54 and 56 would shift along the elapsed time axis as the distance between the objects 30, 32, 33 and 35 changes. Consequently, the echo or reflection signal 50 from the person 30 will include different amplitude modulations 60 at spaced time intervals. This amplitude modulation may result from respiration of the person, the person's heartbeat, and/or the like.
  • Similarly, the echo signal 52 from the deer 32 would also contain amplitude modulations 62 at spaced time intervals. These amplitude modulations 62, however, presumably would be different than the amplitude modulation exhibited by the person 30.
  • Conversely, the received radar echo 54 from the stop sign 33, as well as the received echo 56 from the vehicle 35 in front of the vehicle 26, would not exhibit this type of amplitude modulation since both are inanimate objects. Furthermore, the echo signal 56 from the vehicle 35 is greater than a threshold Ampthresh (FIG. 3) which represents an echo signal larger than any expected animate object.
  • With reference now to FIGS. 1 and 5, the operation of the radar system of the present invention is there illustrated in greater detail. At step 100 the radar transmitter 12 generates a microwave radar signal, preferably in the range of 76-81 GHz, through the antenna 14 and in a known direction relative to the vehicle. In this example, that known direction corresponds to the area of interest 34 forwardly of the vehicle 26 and in the angular range α as shown in FIG. 2. Step 100 then proceeds to step 102.
  • At step 102, the radar receiver 16 receives the echoes from objects within the area of interest 34 through its antennas 18. Each received echo will vary both in amplitude, depending upon the object producing the echo, as well as the elapsed time between the transmission of the radar signal at step 100 and the receipt of its echo. Objects that are closer to the vehicle 26 will exhibit a shorter elapsed time between the transmission of the radar signal and the reception of its echo while, conversely, objects further from the vehicle 26 will exhibit a longer elapsed time between the transmission of the radar signal and the reception of its echo. Step 102 then proceeds to step 104.
  • In order to simplify processing, step 104 eliminates the received radar echoes having an amplitude in excess of Ampthresh. Such reflections or echoes with large amplitudes would correspond to other automotive vehicles and thus inanimate objects. Step 104 then proceeds to step 106.
  • After elimination of the large objects corresponding to automotive vehicles, step 106 determines if there are any other objects that are identified within the range of interest. Consequently, for the example illustrated, the echo 56 corresponding to the vehicle 35 is eliminated from further processing at step 104 so that step 106 determines that there are three separate remaining objects, each corresponding to echoes 50, 52 and 54, and step 106 proceeds to step 108. However, if no objects are found within the range of interest at step 106, step 106 branches back to step 100 where the above process is repeated.
  • At step 108, the processor 20 determines whether the objects 30, 32 and 33 which respectively produce the return echoes 50, 52 and 54 are animate or inanimate. The identification of animate objects within the range of interest 34 may be accomplished in different ways.
  • For example, a plurality of echoes may be received over a relatively long period of time tlong as illustrated in FIG. 4. Each echo 50, 52 or 54 is examined to determine if it exhibits amplitude modulation over that relatively long period of time. Such amplitude modulation can result from a heartbeat, respiration, actual movement of the inanimate object, and the like. In any event, once such amplitude modulation is identified, the processor 20 identifies the object as an animate object.
  • Alternatively, the received echoes from the radar transmission may be compared to match set filters that are previously determined and stored in memory accessible to the processor 20. Such filters may correspond to objects commonly found along highways, such as stop signs, speed limit signs, and the like. When the appropriate filter is applied to the received echo 50, 52 and 54, the object is accordingly identified as either animate or inanimate as the case may be.
  • If the object is identified as inanimate at step 108, step 108 branches to step 110 where the algorithm determines whether or not all objects within the range of interest 34 have been processed. If not, step 110 branches back to step 108 where the above process is repeated.
  • Conversely, in the event that the object is identified as an animate object which could potentially move into the path of travel of the vehicle 26, step 108 instead branches to step 112 where the processor 20 generates an alert signal 24 via the alert control circuit 22. This alert signal 24 may comprise, for example, the display of a symbol on a video display screen, or other alert signals.
  • Alternatively, the alert signal 24 can change the operation of the vehicle itself. For example, in the event of a possible collision with an animate object, the alert signal 24 may automatically apply the vehicle brakes to slow the vehicle or even steer the vehicle around the animate object.
  • From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention provides an automotive radar system which identifies animate objects within a range of interest and which may potentially enter into the path of travel of the vehicle. Having described my invention, however, many modifications thereto will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which it pertains without deviation from the spirit of the invention as defined by the scope of the appended claims.
  • I claim:

Claims (12)

1. An automotive radar system comprising:
a high frequency radio transmitter which generates a radar signal in a known direction,
a high frequency radio receiver which receives echoes from said radar signal, each said echo representing a reflection of the radar signal from an object,
a processor which identifies animate objects from said echoes within a range of interest, and
said processor generating an alert signal for each identified animate object.
2. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said radar system further comprises a video display screen and wherein said alert signal comprises a figure display on said display screen.
3. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said radio transmitter generates said radar signal in the range of 76 GHz to 81 GHz.
4. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said processor identifies each animate object by comparing each object with a matched set filter.
5. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said processor identifies each animate object by detecting amplitude modulation of the received echoes over a period of time.
6. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said processor identifies each animate object by Fourier analysis.
7. A method for utilizing an automotive radar system comprising the steps of:
transmitting a high frequency radar signal in a known direction,
receiving echoes from said radar signal, each echo representing a reflection of the radar signal from an object,
identifying animate objects within a range of interest as a function of said echoes,
generating an alert signal for each identified animate object.
8. The invention as defined in claim 7 wherein said generating step comprises the step of displaying a symbol on a video screen.
9. The invention as defined in claim 7 wherein said identifying step comprises the step of detecting amplitude modulation of the received echoes from the animate object over a period of time.
10. The invention as defined in claim 7 wherein said identifying step comprises the step of comparing the received echoes from each object with a matched set filter.
11. The invention as defined in claim 7 wherein said identifying step comprises the step of disregarding received echoes greater than a predetermined threshold.
12. The invention as defined in claim 7 wherein said identifying step comprises the step of disregarding received echoes less than a predetermined threshold.
US11/944,824 2007-11-26 2007-11-26 Automotive radar system Expired - Fee Related US7532152B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/944,824 US7532152B1 (en) 2007-11-26 2007-11-26 Automotive radar system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/944,824 US7532152B1 (en) 2007-11-26 2007-11-26 Automotive radar system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US7532152B1 US7532152B1 (en) 2009-05-12
US20090135050A1 true US20090135050A1 (en) 2009-05-28

Family

ID=40601586

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/944,824 Expired - Fee Related US7532152B1 (en) 2007-11-26 2007-11-26 Automotive radar system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US7532152B1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100118037A1 (en) * 2008-09-08 2010-05-13 Apple Inc. Object-aware transitions
US8849554B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2014-09-30 Image Sensing Systems, Inc. Hybrid traffic system and associated method
US9472097B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2016-10-18 Image Sensing Systems, Inc. Roadway sensing systems

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8742910B2 (en) * 2009-05-08 2014-06-03 Teknikkonsult Eriksson-Viotti Handelsbolag Impact alert system and method
JP5949721B2 (en) * 2013-10-10 2016-07-13 株式会社デンソー Predecessor selection device
US11521500B1 (en) * 2018-10-17 2022-12-06 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Unmanned aerial systems with range finding
US11577677B2 (en) 2019-09-19 2023-02-14 Diogenes Patrick Rojas Vehicle system that includes external airbag impellers with its mounting structure that, in addition to preventing damage to the outside and the bottom of the vehicle, also allows its buoyancy
US11366214B2 (en) * 2019-12-30 2022-06-21 Woven Planet North America, Inc. Systems and methods for adaptive clutter removal from radar scans

Citations (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3163861A (en) * 1962-05-02 1964-12-29 Suter Henry Electromagnetic field disturbance intruder detection apparatus
US3383678A (en) * 1966-12-23 1968-05-14 Advanced Devices Lab Inc Moving object detection system
US3697985A (en) * 1970-09-23 1972-10-10 Bendix Corp Rear end warning system for automobiles
US3781859A (en) * 1972-04-19 1973-12-25 Seabroad Electric Controlled wave pattern ultrasonic burglar alarm
US3796208A (en) * 1971-09-07 1974-03-12 Memco Ltd Movement monitoring apparatus
US3882495A (en) * 1973-06-11 1975-05-06 Rca Corp Doppler correlation radar providing coarse-range detection resolution
US3983558A (en) * 1974-06-28 1976-09-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Moving target indicating (MTI) radar systems employing vehicle discriminator apparatus
US4051472A (en) * 1974-04-08 1977-09-27 International Telephone And Telegraph Corporation Large area motion sensor using pseudo-random coding technique
US4072945A (en) * 1975-12-02 1978-02-07 Nissan Motor Company, Limited Radar-operated collision avoidance system for roadway vehicles using stored information for determination of valid objects
US4195289A (en) * 1975-12-03 1980-03-25 I.E.I. Proprietary Limited Microwave intrusion or movement detectors
US4632543A (en) * 1983-05-06 1986-12-30 Nissan Motor Company, Limited Optical radar system for vehicles
US4792804A (en) * 1986-05-02 1988-12-20 Dei-Dispositivi Elettronici Industriali Di Rubechini Roberto Apparatus for detecting a body in motion on the ground of a protected area
US4861972A (en) * 1987-11-05 1989-08-29 Spectra-Physics, Inc. Bar code scanner and method of programming
US5019822A (en) * 1973-07-09 1991-05-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Marine object detector
US5049858A (en) * 1990-04-23 1991-09-17 Physitron, Inc. Intrusion detection system
US5081585A (en) * 1987-06-17 1992-01-14 Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. Control system for autonomous automotive vehicle or the like
US5319350A (en) * 1992-12-29 1994-06-07 Demarco Frank Motion detection assembly for use in combination with a motor vehicle
US5337053A (en) * 1993-10-22 1994-08-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method and apparatus for classifying targets
US5343206A (en) * 1990-07-05 1994-08-30 Fiat Auto S.P.A. Method and means for avoiding collision between a motor vehicle and obstacles
US5479173A (en) * 1993-03-08 1995-12-26 Mazda Motor Corporation Obstacle sensing apparatus for vehicles
US5585798A (en) * 1993-07-07 1996-12-17 Mazda Motor Corporation Obstacle detection system for automotive vehicle
US5594414A (en) * 1994-08-02 1997-01-14 Namngani; Abdulatif Collision probability detection system
US5699057A (en) * 1995-06-16 1997-12-16 Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Warning system for vehicle
US5734336A (en) * 1995-05-01 1998-03-31 Collision Avoidance Systems, Inc. Collision avoidance system
US5979586A (en) * 1997-02-05 1999-11-09 Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. Vehicle collision warning system
US5999092A (en) * 1997-08-30 1999-12-07 Ford Motor Company Antenna cluster for a motor road vehicle collision warning system
US6031482A (en) * 1995-12-22 2000-02-29 Office National D'etudes Et De Recherches Aerospatiales (Onera) Method and system for sensing and locating a person, e.g. under an avalanche
US6115651A (en) * 1998-01-15 2000-09-05 Cruz; Diogenes J. Large vehicle blindspot monitor
US6130607A (en) * 1998-10-19 2000-10-10 Eaton Corporation Back-up protection sensor for a vehicle
US6208248B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2001-03-27 Anro Engineering, Inc. Quick response perimeter intrusion detection sensor
US6269307B1 (en) * 1998-08-06 2001-07-31 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Travel safety system for vehicle
US6408247B1 (en) * 1999-04-28 2002-06-18 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Obstacle detecting system
US6813562B2 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-11-02 General Motors Corporation Threat assessment algorithm for forward collision warning
US20050024257A1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2005-02-03 Michael Britton Object detection apparatus and method
US6903677B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2005-06-07 Fujitsu Limited Collision prediction device, method of predicting collision, and computer product
US7009503B2 (en) * 2003-03-25 2006-03-07 Idealab Collision warning systems and methods
US20060091654A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2006-05-04 Autoliv Asp, Inc. Sensor system with radar sensor and vision sensor
US7046128B2 (en) * 2004-05-26 2006-05-16 Roberts Kristie L Collision detection and warning system for automobiles
US20060190175A1 (en) * 2003-01-28 2006-08-24 Toyoto Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Collision predicting apparatus and collision predicting method
US7102496B1 (en) * 2002-07-30 2006-09-05 Yazaki North America, Inc. Multi-sensor integration for a vehicle

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS522526B2 (en) 1972-05-20 1977-01-22
FR2717131B1 (en) 1994-03-09 1996-04-19 Valeo Vision Vehicle projector incorporating a millimeter wave radar.
JP4043276B2 (en) 2002-04-24 2008-02-06 株式会社日立製作所 Radar equipment
US7411542B2 (en) 2005-02-10 2008-08-12 Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. Automotive radar system with guard beam
DE102005006763A1 (en) 2005-02-15 2006-08-24 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for object recognition

Patent Citations (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3163861A (en) * 1962-05-02 1964-12-29 Suter Henry Electromagnetic field disturbance intruder detection apparatus
US3383678A (en) * 1966-12-23 1968-05-14 Advanced Devices Lab Inc Moving object detection system
US3697985A (en) * 1970-09-23 1972-10-10 Bendix Corp Rear end warning system for automobiles
US3796208A (en) * 1971-09-07 1974-03-12 Memco Ltd Movement monitoring apparatus
US3781859A (en) * 1972-04-19 1973-12-25 Seabroad Electric Controlled wave pattern ultrasonic burglar alarm
US3882495A (en) * 1973-06-11 1975-05-06 Rca Corp Doppler correlation radar providing coarse-range detection resolution
US5019822A (en) * 1973-07-09 1991-05-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Marine object detector
US4051472A (en) * 1974-04-08 1977-09-27 International Telephone And Telegraph Corporation Large area motion sensor using pseudo-random coding technique
US3983558A (en) * 1974-06-28 1976-09-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Moving target indicating (MTI) radar systems employing vehicle discriminator apparatus
US4072945A (en) * 1975-12-02 1978-02-07 Nissan Motor Company, Limited Radar-operated collision avoidance system for roadway vehicles using stored information for determination of valid objects
US4195289A (en) * 1975-12-03 1980-03-25 I.E.I. Proprietary Limited Microwave intrusion or movement detectors
US4632543A (en) * 1983-05-06 1986-12-30 Nissan Motor Company, Limited Optical radar system for vehicles
US4792804A (en) * 1986-05-02 1988-12-20 Dei-Dispositivi Elettronici Industriali Di Rubechini Roberto Apparatus for detecting a body in motion on the ground of a protected area
US5081585A (en) * 1987-06-17 1992-01-14 Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. Control system for autonomous automotive vehicle or the like
US4861972A (en) * 1987-11-05 1989-08-29 Spectra-Physics, Inc. Bar code scanner and method of programming
US4861972B1 (en) * 1987-11-05 2000-12-05 Spectra Physics Scanning Syst Bar code scanner and method of programming
US5049858A (en) * 1990-04-23 1991-09-17 Physitron, Inc. Intrusion detection system
US5343206A (en) * 1990-07-05 1994-08-30 Fiat Auto S.P.A. Method and means for avoiding collision between a motor vehicle and obstacles
US5319350A (en) * 1992-12-29 1994-06-07 Demarco Frank Motion detection assembly for use in combination with a motor vehicle
US5479173A (en) * 1993-03-08 1995-12-26 Mazda Motor Corporation Obstacle sensing apparatus for vehicles
US5585798A (en) * 1993-07-07 1996-12-17 Mazda Motor Corporation Obstacle detection system for automotive vehicle
US5337053A (en) * 1993-10-22 1994-08-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method and apparatus for classifying targets
US5594414A (en) * 1994-08-02 1997-01-14 Namngani; Abdulatif Collision probability detection system
US5734336A (en) * 1995-05-01 1998-03-31 Collision Avoidance Systems, Inc. Collision avoidance system
US5699057A (en) * 1995-06-16 1997-12-16 Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Warning system for vehicle
US6031482A (en) * 1995-12-22 2000-02-29 Office National D'etudes Et De Recherches Aerospatiales (Onera) Method and system for sensing and locating a person, e.g. under an avalanche
US5979586A (en) * 1997-02-05 1999-11-09 Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. Vehicle collision warning system
US5999092A (en) * 1997-08-30 1999-12-07 Ford Motor Company Antenna cluster for a motor road vehicle collision warning system
US6115651A (en) * 1998-01-15 2000-09-05 Cruz; Diogenes J. Large vehicle blindspot monitor
US6269307B1 (en) * 1998-08-06 2001-07-31 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Travel safety system for vehicle
US6130607A (en) * 1998-10-19 2000-10-10 Eaton Corporation Back-up protection sensor for a vehicle
US6208248B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2001-03-27 Anro Engineering, Inc. Quick response perimeter intrusion detection sensor
US6408247B1 (en) * 1999-04-28 2002-06-18 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Obstacle detecting system
US7102496B1 (en) * 2002-07-30 2006-09-05 Yazaki North America, Inc. Multi-sensor integration for a vehicle
US6813562B2 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-11-02 General Motors Corporation Threat assessment algorithm for forward collision warning
US20060190175A1 (en) * 2003-01-28 2006-08-24 Toyoto Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Collision predicting apparatus and collision predicting method
US7009503B2 (en) * 2003-03-25 2006-03-07 Idealab Collision warning systems and methods
US6903677B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2005-06-07 Fujitsu Limited Collision prediction device, method of predicting collision, and computer product
US20050024257A1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2005-02-03 Michael Britton Object detection apparatus and method
US6861972B2 (en) * 2003-07-28 2005-03-01 Ellistar Sensor Systems, Inc. Object detection apparatus and method
US7046128B2 (en) * 2004-05-26 2006-05-16 Roberts Kristie L Collision detection and warning system for automobiles
US20060091654A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2006-05-04 Autoliv Asp, Inc. Sensor system with radar sensor and vision sensor

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100118037A1 (en) * 2008-09-08 2010-05-13 Apple Inc. Object-aware transitions
US8849554B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2014-09-30 Image Sensing Systems, Inc. Hybrid traffic system and associated method
US9472097B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2016-10-18 Image Sensing Systems, Inc. Roadway sensing systems
US10055979B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2018-08-21 Image Sensing Systems, Inc. Roadway sensing systems
US11080995B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2021-08-03 Image Sensing Systems, Inc. Roadway sensing systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7532152B1 (en) 2009-05-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7532152B1 (en) Automotive radar system
EP1371997B1 (en) Method for detecting stationary object on road by radar
US9604572B2 (en) Method for maintaining a warning signal in a motor vehicle on the basis of the presence of a target object in a warning region, in particular a blind spot region, corresponding driver assistance system, and motor vehicle
EP1804076B1 (en) System and method for generating a radar detection threshold
US6469659B1 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting radar obstruction
US10310083B2 (en) Method for detecting target echoes in a received signal of an ultrasonic sensor of a motor vehicle, ultrasonic sensor device, and motor vehicle
CN106461772B (en) Signal processing method in radar installations and radar installations
EP1806596A1 (en) Method and system for generating a target alert
EP1326087B1 (en) Apparatus and method for radar data processing
US6121916A (en) Method and apparatus for recognizing stationary objects with a moving side-looking radar
US7379018B1 (en) System and method for verifying a radar detection
US20070182587A1 (en) Method and device for detecting objects in the surroundings of a vehicle
US10473760B2 (en) Radar device and vertical axis-misalignment detecting method
US10444341B2 (en) Road clutter mitigation
US7119734B2 (en) Target determination apparatus, target judgment apparatus, and determination aid apparatus
JP2787014B2 (en) Vehicle obstacle identification system
TW201405155A (en) Motion parameter estimating method, angle estimating method and determination method
JP2008089505A (en) Radar device
CN210617998U (en) Blind area detection equipment for freight transport and passenger transport vehicles
US11209537B2 (en) Extended target-matched CFAR detector
US20040210350A1 (en) Leaky cable based method and system for automotive parking aid, reversing aid, and pre-collision sensing
CN113552575A (en) Parking obstacle detection method and device
GB2378597A (en) Object Detection Device
JPH0634755A (en) On-vehicle radar
CN117406227A (en) Early warning position judging system and method for vehicle-mounted radar

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AME

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:YONAK, SERDAR H.;REEL/FRAME:020152/0810

Effective date: 20071108

AS Assignment

Owner name: TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023003/0011

Effective date: 20090715

CC Certificate of correction
REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20130512